cvs commit: ports/print/cups-lpr Makefile pkg-deinstall
pkg-install pkg-message
Brian F. Feldman
green at FreeBSD.org
Mon Nov 24 09:49:18 PST 2003
"Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 05:20:13PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> > On (2003/11/21 16:18), Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> >
> > > FreeBSD ports repository
> > >
> > > Modified files:
> > > print/cups-lpr Makefile
> > > Added files:
> > > print/cups-lpr pkg-deinstall pkg-install pkg-message
> > > Log:
> > > - Move lpr binaries in base away, so cups binaries in /usr/local/bin
> > > get picked.
> > > - Move them back on deinstall.
> >
> > This is only a partial solution; the next "make world" will blow away
> > these binaries.
> >
> > Also, if I'm using the binary updater package, it'll have a cow on the
> > next lpr update.
> >
> > I really think you should be leaving this up to the sysadmin,
> > documenting the list of files that should be removed, and recommending
> > the use of NO_LPR=yes in /etc/make.conf.
>
> Seconded, this is a *horrible* thing to do. Please back this out.
> Ports should not mess with the base system unless the administrator
> *specifically* asks for it. A knob in the style of *_OVERWRITE_BASE
> is probably appropriate.
A better solution is having a separate CUPS prefix for lpr which can be
added to an individual's path based on his or her preferences.
--
Brian Fundakowski Feldman \'[ FreeBSD ]''''''''''\
<> green at FreeBSD.org \ The Power to Serve! \
Opinions expressed are my own. \,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,\
More information about the cvs-ports
mailing list