cvs commit: ports/www/libxul Makefile distinfo

Beat Gätzi beat at FreeBSD.org
Sat Oct 8 06:22:45 UTC 2011


On Oct 8, 2011, at 3:06 AM, Doug Barton wrote:

> On 10/07/2011 13:59, Beat Gaetzi wrote:
>> beat        2011-10-07 20:59:11 UTC
>> 
>>  FreeBSD ports repository
>> 
>>  Modified files:
>>    www/libxul           Makefile distinfo 
>>  Log:
>>  - Update to 1.9.2.23
>>  - Use Firefox source tarball to build libxul as upstrem no longer provides
>>    xulrunner tarballs for the 1.9.2 branch.
> 
> I'm excited to see an update to this vulnerable port, but I'm wondering
> why require the 3.6.23 version instead of the latest version which most
> users would have on their system already?

Because newer xulrunner versions removed gtkmozembed which is used
by a large number of depended ports. Flo and I did a test on a tinderbox
with libxul 7.0 (which is already in our gecko repository) and it breaks quite
some port. Unfortunately for most of these ports upstream doesn't provide a
newer version which no longer depends on gtkmozembed. Patching all
these ports manually is quite some work and I don't want to do this. But it
looks like you are going to volunteer?

Beat

> Doug
> 
>>  Discussed with: flo@ at EuroBSDCon DevSummit
>> 
>>  Revision  Changes    Path
>>  1.31      +3 -4      ports/www/libxul/Makefile
>>  1.17      +2 -2      ports/www/libxul/distinfo
>> 
>> http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/www/libxul/Makefile.diff?&r1=1.30&r2=1.31&f=h
>> http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/www/libxul/distinfo.diff?&r1=1.16&r2=1.17&f=h
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> 	Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
> 			-- OK Go
> 
> 	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
> 	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/
> 



More information about the cvs-all mailing list