cvs commit: ports/archivers/lzma Makefile ports/archivers/paq Makefile ports/archivers/ppmd-7z Makefile ports/devel/abi-compliance-checker Makefile ports/devel/api-sanity-autotest Makefile ports/devel/distorm Makefile ports/devel/libdisasm ...

[b. f.]

On 7/8/10, Erwin Lansing <erwin at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 12:51:38PM +0000, Brendan Fabeny wrote:
>> bf          2010-07-08 12:51:38 UTC
>>
>>   FreeBSD ports repository
>>
>>   Modified files:
>>     archivers/lzma       Makefile
>>     archivers/paq        Makefile
>>     archivers/ppmd-7z    Makefile
>>     devel/abi-compliance-checker Makefile
>>     devel/api-sanity-autotest Makefile
>>     devel/distorm        Makefile
>>     devel/libdisasm      Makefile
>>     devel/py-distorm     Makefile
>>     devel/udis86         Makefile
>>     games/xwordpy        Makefile
>>     graphics/exact-image Makefile
>>     graphics/tesseract   Makefile
>>     math/R               Makefile
>>     math/dieharder       Makefile
>>     math/gsl             Makefile
>>     math/jags            Makefile
>>     math/librandlib      Makefile
>>     math/libranlip       Makefile
>>     math/lll_spect       Makefile
>>     math/maxima          Makefile
>>     math/prng            Makefile
>>     math/rngstreams      Makefile
>>     math/testu01         Makefile
>>     math/unuran          Makefile
>>     net-mgmt/kismet      Makefile
>>     print/gv             Makefile
>>     print/flpsed         Makefile
>>     print/gsview         Makefile
>>     textproc/libtre      Makefile
>>     textproc/py-libtre   Makefile
>>     textproc/wv          Makefile
>>     textproc/unrtf       Makefile
>>     www/dillo2           Makefile
>>   Log:
>>   Change my ports to use my FreeBSD.org email address.
>
> This is a sweeping commit explicitly not allowed during a slush.  Also,
> I am not seeing approval by one of your mentors.  Please take more care.
>
> -erwin
>
>>
>>   Revision  Changes    Path
>>   1.41      +1 -1      ports/archivers/lzma/Makefile
>>   1.17      +1 -1      ports/archivers/paq/Makefile
>>   1.13      +1 -1      ports/archivers/ppmd-7z/Makefile
>>   1.10      +2 -2      ports/devel/abi-compliance-checker/Makefile
>>   1.2       +2 -2      ports/devel/api-sanity-autotest/Makefile
>>   1.5       +1 -1      ports/devel/distorm/Makefile
>>   1.9       +1 -1      ports/devel/libdisasm/Makefile
>>   1.10      +1 -1      ports/devel/py-distorm/Makefile
>>   1.6       +1 -1      ports/devel/udis86/Makefile
>>   1.6       +1 -1      ports/games/xwordpy/Makefile
>>   1.17      +1 -1      ports/graphics/exact-image/Makefile
>>   1.12      +1 -1      ports/graphics/tesseract/Makefile
>>   1.90      +1 -1      ports/math/R/Makefile
>>   1.13      +1 -1      ports/math/dieharder/Makefile
>>   1.48      +1 -1      ports/math/gsl/Makefile
>>   1.20      +1 -1      ports/math/jags/Makefile
>>   1.19      +1 -1      ports/math/librandlib/Makefile
>>   1.2       +2 -2      ports/math/libranlip/Makefile
>>   1.3       +2 -2      ports/math/lll_spect/Makefile
>>   1.57      +1 -1      ports/math/maxima/Makefile
>>   1.2       +2 -2      ports/math/prng/Makefile
>>   1.4       +1 -1      ports/math/rngstreams/Makefile
>>   1.7       +1 -1      ports/math/testu01/Makefile
>>   1.10      +1 -1      ports/math/unuran/Makefile
>>   1.28      +1 -1      ports/net-mgmt/kismet/Makefile
>>   1.14      +1 -1      ports/print/flpsed/Makefile
>>   1.7       +1 -1      ports/print/gsview/Makefile
>>   1.68      +1 -1      ports/print/gv/Makefile
>>   1.53      +1 -1      ports/textproc/libtre/Makefile
>>   1.5       +1 -1      ports/textproc/py-libtre/Makefile
>>   1.22      +1 -1      ports/textproc/unrtf/Makefile
>>   1.56      +1 -1      ports/textproc/wv/Makefile
>>   1.51      +1 -1      ports/www/dillo2/Makefile
> --
> Erwin Lansing                                   http://droso.org
> Prediction is very difficult
> especially about the future                    erwin at FreeBSD.org
>

Sorry, I'll do so.  I forgot to mention in the commit message that
makc@ gave his approval, and miwi@ did not object to the commit.  And
my reading of the criteria for sweeping change suggested that this
would be admissible because it was a "cosmetic change", mostly to leaf
ports (with the exception of textproc/wv). If I misunderstood what is
considered to be cosmetic, please let me know.  I wanted to get this
in because I've already missed the auto-assign of two PRs related to
ports that I maintain.

Regards,
              b.