cvs commit: ports/shells/bash Makefile pkg-plist

[David O'Brien]

On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 01:34:26PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> David O'Brien wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 09:54:01AM +0000, Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
>>> osa         2009-03-12 09:54:01 UTC
>>>   FreeBSD ports repository
>>>   Modified files:
>>>     shells/bash          Makefile pkg-plist   Log:
>>>   Fix pkg-plist.
>>>   Bump PORTREVISION.
>> Thanks for fixing the PLIST (much appreciated), but why did you bump
>> PORTREVISION for a PLIST change?
>> There is zero reason to force a reinstall for a PLIST change.  Either the
>> port is already installed (and the user can wait for some other reason to
>> update), or the port isn't installed and bumping PORTREVISION does
>> nothing.
> 
> It's needed for package cluster, otherwise it does not know to rebuild and 
> will serve incomplete package forever.

Did it used to parts commit emails and rebuild based on them?  Or did we
used to just rebuild all packages quite often?

-- 
-- David  (obrien at FreeBSD.org)
Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
A: Why is top-posting (putting a reply at the top of the message) frowned upon?
Let's not play "Jeopardy-style quoting"