cvs commit: ports/devel/scons Makefile distinfo pkg-plist
Alexey Dokuchaev
danfe at FreeBSD.org
Mon Jul 13 17:43:24 UTC 2009
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 07:08:29PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> >> - Update to checkpoint release 1.2.0_20090223
> > This change is wrong; PORTREVISION should not be used to encode any
> > software version part; its sole purpose for ports infrastructure only.
> > For complex vendor versions, DISTVERSION should be used instead. Right
> > now, for instance, you've essentially made impossible to bump PORTREVISION,
> > shall it be required for any reason, without introducing ugly hacks.
>
> This sounds very familiar to the status quo I maintained with the lang/gcc
> ports for some years which I then resolved a few months ago. Philip, you
> may want to have a look at lang/gcc43 for an example how I addressed this
> there -- and if you find improvements, let me know. ;-)
In your case, Gerald, you seem to deal this the fact that GCC people
drop minor .4 version for their snapshots, e.g. for version 4.3.4.%date%
snapshot would be 4.3-%date% as opposed to 4.3.4-%date% (the latter
would allow you to user DISTVERSION without cryptic VERSIONSTRING hack).
In Philip's case, DISTVERSION should be enought, I guess.
./danfe
More information about the cvs-all
mailing list