cvs commit: ports/archivers/lzip Makefile distinfo

[Gary Jennejohn]

On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 07:44:51 -0300
Marcelo Araujo <araujobsdport at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 07:37:53AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 02:28:41PM +0000, Marcelo Araujo wrote:
> > > araujo      2009-06-30 14:28:41 UTC
> > > 
> > >   FreeBSD ports repository
> > > 
> > >   Modified files:
> > >     archivers/lzip       Makefile distinfo 
> > >   Log:
> > >   - Update to 1.7.
> > >   
> > >   PR:             based on ports/136003
> > >   Submitted by:   Sylvio Cesar <scjamorim at bsd.com.br> (maintainer)
> > >   Approved by:    maintainer
> > 
> > Why would maintainer need to explicitly approve their changes?
> 
> Hi danfe,
> 
> It is very easy to answer, because he knows better than me if the new
> version is usable or not. The maintainer submitted an update to 1.6, and as
> we have a new release, I feel that was better ask the maintainer about that.
> 
> Generally the maintainer knows better than us what is good or not for your
> ports. Of course everybody knows that.
> 

When the maintainer submits an update to one of his ports then he
rather obviously has also automatically approved the changes.

I think that is what danfe was getting at.

---
Gary Jennejohn