cvs commit: ports/sysutils/fusefs-ntfs Makefile distinfo ports/sysutils/fusefs-ntfs/files extra-patch-ublio patch-libntfs-3g-device_io.c patch-libntfs-3g__device.c patch-libntfs-3g__unix_io.c patch-src-ntfs-3g.c pkg-message.in unix_io_raw.c

[Max Khon]

Hi!

On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 03:42:24PM -0300, Alejandro Pulver wrote:

> > > > alepulver    2007-06-07 04:01:33 UTC
> > > > 
> > > >   FreeBSD ports repository
> > > > 
> > > >   Modified files:
> > > >     sysutils/fusefs-ntfs Makefile distinfo 
> > > >   Added files:
> > > >     sysutils/fusefs-ntfs/files extra-patch-ublio 
> > > >                                patch-libntfs-3g__device.c 
> > > >                                patch-libntfs-3g__unix_io.c 
> > > >                                pkg-message.in 
> > > >   Removed files:
> > > >     sysutils/fusefs-ntfs/files patch-libntfs-3g-device_io.c 
> > > >                                patch-src-ntfs-3g.c unix_io_raw.c 
> > > 
> > > Why did you rename patch files? Please back this out.
> > 
> > This is not the first time I've seen people rename existing patch files,
> > while IIRC current policy tells us to abstain from doing so.  Only new
> > files are subject to new (more strict) naming rules.  Let's follow the
> > guidelines.
> 
> I think there has been a misunderstanding here: the removed patch file
> is for device_io.c, and the added one for device.c which are different
> files with different sets of changes.

Indeed. Anyway, I'd prefer that you keep existing naming rules next time.

/fjoe