cvs commit: ports/mail/qmail Makefile pkg-plist ports/mail/qmail/files rcNG

[Renato Botelho]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 08:54:06AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Renato Botelho wrote:
> > garga       2007-07-28 13:50:18 UTC
> > 
> >   FreeBSD ports repository
> > 
> >   Modified files:
> >     mail/qmail           Makefile pkg-plist 
> >   Added files:
> >     mail/qmail/files     rcNG 
> >   Log:
> >   - Add a rcNG startup script to ${PREFIX}/boot
> >   
> >   PR:             ports/110109  http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=110109
> >   Submitted by:   kitsune <v.velox at vvelox.net>
> >   
> >   Revision  Changes    Path
> >   1.122     +3 -0      ports/mail/qmail/Makefile
> >   1.1       +83 -0     ports/mail/qmail/files/rcNG (new)
> >   1.15      +2 -1      ports/mail/qmail/pkg-plist
> > 
> > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/mail/qmail/Makefile.diff?&r1=1.121&r2=1.122&f=h
> > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/mail/qmail/files/rcNG
> > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/mail/qmail/pkg-plist.diff?&r1=1.14&r2=1.15&f=h
> 
> Can I ask why this was done in such a non-standard way? I have a
> number of concerns, but maybe if you explain what's being done some of
> them will be relieved. :)

qmail and qmail related ports are non-standard on lot of things. I added
this non-standard rcNG script as an example, it doesn't touch etc/rc.d
and so i was not worried with it.

- -- 
Renato Botelho <garga @ FreeBSD.org>
               <freebsd @ galle.com.br>
GnuPG Key: http://www.FreeBSD.org/~garga/pubkey.asc

What awful irony is this?
We are as gods, but know it not.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFGrenC6CRbiSJE7akRAn8BAJwMCIQ6vkD2DYFbmar7MNI6wycj/ACfUTwT
vHt6a1sV/sCa1t/FCr/3mv8=
=7DUp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----