cvs commit: src/lib/libc/stdlib malloc.c
Pascal Hofstee
caelian at gmail.com
Sat Jan 14 14:31:52 PST 2006
Jason Evans wrote:
> On Jan 14, 2006, at 1:32 PM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>> On 2006-01-13 11:07, Jason Evans <jasone at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>>> On Jan 12, 2006, at 5:29 PM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>>>> Does it look like I'm right in thinking that this is a bug in Emacs?
>>>
>>> This looks like a bug in emacs, as you say, but I don't know if it
>>> has any particular relation to the posix_memalign() changes.
>>
>> Apparently it does seem related to posix_memalign() changes.
>> When I bootstrap Emacs without posix_memalign(), by manually
>> tweaking src/config.h after configure runs, and #undef
>> POSIX_MEMALIGN, then it passes the bootstrap stage normally.
>
> Hmm, that's interesting. I'll mess around with emacs later on today
> (though I only have i386 hardware at the moment). Right now, I'm
> still building xorg on my machine in order to try to reproduce the gtk
> problems that Pascal Hofstee reported.
Hi Jason .. In the mean while i decided to do a pkg_delete -a followed
by a fresh gnome install from standard ports instead of Joe Marcus
Clarke's MC-gnome tree .. and it looks like the main culprit is
glib-2.9.2 as the observed GTK-problems do not occur with the glib20
port that is currently in the main ports-tree. So i think it's safe to
assume glib-2.9.2 is seriously busted and jemalloc just happened to
Really get pissed about it :)
I did encounter a malloc bug that's triggered by Evolution resulting in
a runaway process that basically eats up all memory+swap before the
kernel shoots it down .. but i am trying to get gnome@ to help me out on
that one.
But overall i think it's safe to assume that the gtk-issue i reported
earlier is linked to a malloc bug in glib-2.9.2 which is included in the
MC-gnome tree.
--
Pascal Hofstee
More information about the cvs-all
mailing list