cvs commit: ports/sysutils/portupgrade Makefile distinfo

[Pav Lucistnik]

Ion-Mihai Tetcu píše v ne 01. 01. 2006 v 19:10 +0200:
> On Sun, 1 Jan 2006 15:43:35 +0000 (UTC)
> Norikatsu Shigemura <nork at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> 
> >   (5) The frequency of INDEX generation on official site is now
> > sufficient, recommend to run "portsdb -F" (fetch INDEX from official
> > site) instead of "portsdb -U" (make INDEX by yourself) in portsdb(1).
> > [1] 
> 
> >   PR:             ports/91164
> >   Submitted by:   KOMATSU Shinichiro <koma2 at lovepeers.org>
> > (maintainer) Pointed out by: Enrique Matias <cronopios at gmail dot
> > com> [1]
> 
> This is a very bad idea; locally generated INDEX contains all
> use-defined OPTIONS, etc. while the fetched one contains only the
> defaults thus his has the potential to break the wonderful
> upward-recursive usage of portupgrade.

How does it breaks upward recursive usage of portupgrade? The contents
of /var/db/pkg are used for that, not INDEX file.

-- 
Pav Lucistnik <pav at oook.cz>
              <pav at FreeBSD.org>

The use of the lavatory is restricted to the train's cat.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all/attachments/20060101/f020b65e/attachment.bin