cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/config configvers.h
Ruslan Ermilov
ru at freebsd.org
Fri Nov 4 08:33:29 PST 2005
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 09:15:49AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <20051104120642.GL29387 at submonkey.net>
> Ceri Davies <ceri at submonkey.net> writes:
> : On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 12:56:01PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> : > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 09:34:36AM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote:
> : > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 09:18:58AM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> : > > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 04:16:44AM +0000, Warner Losh wrote:
> : > > > > imp 2005-11-04 04:16:44 UTC
> : > > > >
> : > > > > FreeBSD src repository
> : > > > >
> : > > > > Modified files:
> : > > > > usr.sbin/config configvers.h
> : > > > > Log:
> : > > > > since nocpu isn't used in the kernel config base, we don't need to
> : > > > > bump the version. Peter Wemm, John Baldwin and I hammered this out
> : > > > > after the last time I needlessly incremented the version.
> : > > > >
> : > > > > Revision Changes Path
> : > > > > 1.38 +1 -1 src/usr.sbin/config/configvers.h
> : > > > >
> : > > > Our users wanted to *use* the "nocpu" directive in their configs
> : > > > that are based on GENERIC (GENERIC is included), hence I bumped
> : > > > config(8). Otherwise, one day some would scream that "nocpu"
> : > > > doesn't work for them, because they're using the older version
> : > > > of config(8).
>
> I will agree that bumping the config version will force users to
> install a new config. At the same time, a new config cannot be used
> for old kernels, like the ones in 6.0. Since this is the only
> incompatibility between 6.0 and current, it seemed a little
> gratuitous.
>
> There's no documentation about what features are in what versions of
> config. If you don't bump the version, then we can MFC these changes
> and users can use config in 6.x. A nit is that there's no nocpu in
> config.5.
>
> My position is that the inconvenience of having multiple versions of
> config is worse than the minor confusion when nocpu doesn't work.
>
> : > > I'd agree that the Makefiles don't need to be bumped, as they don't
> : > > actually require the new config, but config has new functionality and
> : > > the version should probably be bumped in the binary.
> : > >
> : > You cannot just bump it in one place, the version requirement doesn't
> : > understand >=, only =.
> :
> : Oh. Insert obvious next question here. :)
> : What happens to those people who have already installed 600004 then?
>
> They will need to install a new config if they want to build a new
> kernel. Maybe it is time to change the versioning so that multiple
> versions will work.
>
This is all not needed if you're using an official upgrade method:
buildworld/buildkernel, which will take care of updating config(8)
for you.
Cheers,
--
Ruslan Ermilov
ru at FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all/attachments/20051104/7a2c7102/attachment.bin
More information about the cvs-all
mailing list