cvs commit: src/sys/vm uma_core.c

[Dag-Erling Smørgrav]

Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green at FreeBSD.org> writes:
> Any subsequent desire to change the semantics of malloc(9) or
> uma_zalloc(9) in the M_WAITOK case, such as this, absolutely must be
> taken up with the Security Officer.

There is no mention anywhere in the SO charter about the SO being
responsible for your lack of maturity.  If you have a technical
argument to make, we have technical mailing lists for precisely that
purpose.  Otherwise, please allow Bosko to do what he thinks best.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des at des.no