cvs commit: ports/games/linux-nwserver Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist

[Dan Langille]

On 26 Jan 2004 at 20:51, Don Lewis wrote:

> On 26 Jan, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 09:14:30PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
> >> FreshPorts noted that this message (and two others) did not have a 
> >> Message-Id field.
> > 
> > Note also the date..a mail system is regurgitating old messages.
> 
> Judging by the Received: headers, it appears to be the hub.FreeBSD.org
> mail servers.  Some of the regurgitated messages that I've seen were
> either sent by me or were parts of threads that I followed, and of the
> ones that I checked, I did not receive the message when it was first
> sent. It looks like at least some of these messages got stuck in the
> queue and just now got unstuck.
> 
> Here are the relevant Received: headers from one of the messages I sent
> several weeks ago and didn't receive until just a little while ago:
> 
> Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [216.136.204.119])	by gw.catspoiler.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0R2Tw7D079431	for <dl-freebsd at catspoiler.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 18:29:58 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from owner-freebsd-current at freebsd.org)
> Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [216.136.204.18])	by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP	id 02724579B7; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 18:29:57 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from owner-freebsd-current at freebsd.org)
> Received: from hub.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP	id AA28A16A4E9; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 18:29:53 -0800 (PST)
> Delivered-To: freebsd-current at freebsd.org
> Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F2016A4CE	for <current at FreeBSD.org>; Sun,  4 Jan 2004 15:35:00 -0800 (PST)
> Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (217-ip-163.nccn.net [209.79.217.163])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 174B843D49	for <current at FreeBSD.org>; Sun,  4 Jan 2004 15:34:52 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from truckman at FreeBSD.org)

>From the FreshPorts database, I count 66 messages which were received 
on 26 Jan for commits between 2003-10-21 03:34:15-07 and 2003-12-23 
12:35:08-08.  There are not duplicated messages (i.e. the Message-ID 
fields were not already in FreshPorts).  These messages where caught 
up somewhere.

For details of these commits, see 
http://www.freshports.org/tmp/delayed-commits.2004.01.16.html

For those using the FreshPorts notification service, these commits 
will be appearing in your next notification message.  For 
notifications, FreshPorts has always worked off the date a commit is 
added to the database and not the commit date.  This strategy was 
chosen to cater for the situation described above.
-- 
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/