From nobody Thu Mar 14 14:08:28 2024 X-Original-To: zfs-devel@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TwTkN1wFbz5D48R for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 14:08:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TwTkN0cqzz4nDv for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 14:08:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1710425308; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Wcp1Re7Np2oREOyhUYCyexcX+W1iiWksX0YSo3yjUbNhHZm6PHGmsun0+NmNdCDzkcVN/R /gN7hxXid+LUrO3rjtoXOYxV+gG1LMj0US5NzgsTWrHewhWKYNlD7OYUKEhrUNuDnaa4Kz Qa+ZERocK0hsX082C9Uy39e2vpyk6G/gQVquAmDawSbI51/3Cw8fxJYpBLdvRITz1id3Jo c3QloWIu3NqkMSs6iJ5Zpm7Q8FDYbD94+kwBMcM3YjOiYmXc2DNogj6D4SKrmQPhCUkdAJ vMQmt2tWgOE0yx+gr0fZ4/9WQLP068Lcw510erl24MlA996xkj4BSiCdy0Hp5A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1710425308; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=I+sFjn7/LqE3GzF+vpRaqT39hLR8K+DResz83Iy2zD0=; b=yCNmO27FkWU7ukS5kLuOvmPNQUwJEWfVB5imjqp/iiUMFkAPt55kfAtaPOhXsNfATWk8q6 ij7CUAFl8PoXaV75y+CzOKGFaa2EzsTmBetH3oRVbvrPScq4WItDPfbR+KE2L9gYbhhDyl u2dnwNlnn8Gvd/wK+82Iih//UMtltTgBWc+iqodM1Q66iadQN84n/nF8Aqa0VtpTPyEF8n 031Zz31/Fj/OiZh0/6it6AEdgYTQpm3/22WE2txt+7kH/YLxnTFpf8xpdaj1CYuVEDs/nJ aDRRZdRmEiaYi4TObgm0RUzbswHarNPTTgP5X3hgSzSabY8W5+LVpYjHDDU+bA== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TwTkN0DxnzW61 for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 14:08:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 42EE8RfY075072 for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 14:08:27 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 42EE8RBh075071 for zfs-devel@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 14:08:27 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: zfs-devel@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 277389] Reproduceable low memory freeze on 14.0-RELEASE-p5 Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 14:08:28 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: marklmi26-fbsd@yahoo.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: ZFS file system development for FreeBSD discussions List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/zfs-devel List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-zfs-devel@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: zfs-devel@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D277389 --- Comment #14 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to pascal.guitierrez from comment #11) Given the message, it might be wroth reporting if likes of sysctl vm.pageout_oom_seq=3D120 (or larger?) makes any difference and what the difference is, even if it ends up being that it just takes longer to fail. Going in a different direction, what configuration difference(s) lead me and Kurt Jaeger to not get the problem when we tried to test? Kurt's the better example since ot was a 14.0-RELEASE context. This would be an area to explore comparisons/contrasts for. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=