From nobody Sat Dec 02 21:09:44 2023 X-Original-To: xfce@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4SjMy066Mtz52cnF for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2023 21:09:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4SjMy03bjdz4hvV for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2023 21:09:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1701551384; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zX/OI9es/80Z4YH2JR9Gg8tuG2lBiI53s3wjoi7Pbt0=; b=XSDMMg3ArUtMWzIf3lomVVreozWDiJFEn1QPEz2ikzrgkcIJ8Juq+kAcX8W5jy7r0ixYYB wS0ujzs9aK7pIcm/uc9lj0zbqSM09+uHXbD7oYn0Z7zazEpYrdNMYgBbG5qFX1z88kBQsY 2CCmkebKDI43OWAH1DZZF3XfO7akJg03Ot0Nqav9c//nddVVmzXq6k53DGNBFXNfJO98gb RoavITqFEyxCt5i6tQoRsbAtbVyJVo8+JRVnWm7po5HURGAve+cMnLgcRGe3t2tPcNWMI+ v9DhIHuJid8K5JUAJcjQH+jNBg2GKJVMcTyS+QOMa0cW4soJsylupBScFpc0tQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1701551384; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=WPqw0IpAyBOTHIWWoixqLsGBwpoSFFAUW5QL0rKP9oqOCjin2TRygbauvMJSwAonYpJghm rIUtJvrNHh5qs3erJIomsnkVHvQxQGUjXiwZp6ASD6Sm99bzUMOLWSsvL7C5Tj6IjUlg46 ARot4HWWHmbOwGVxUinI8/+Me8MUiXokE1ogT2Kc/TPXOJ6x/ohWmhoM3awzht9OMUu+oG Ws4pJ+PGk5LLySr2gde529L8ogRLxVLNfRogp/W55O+CXmYAtvBbIAyE5rBxsvziXI9CyH xLglSLqoTjNYjP7zGZ8ZGi/KR06isy9fD0v3obnk2kKMU7TJYoxC2pJV0izHwQ== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4SjMy02gV4zXRh for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2023 21:09:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 3B2L9ik2015100 for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2023 21:09:44 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 3B2L9ivj015099 for xfce@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 2 Dec 2023 21:09:44 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: xfce@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 275487] x11-themes/xfce-icons-elementary (still) not prefix-safe Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2023 21:09:44 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: mi@ALDAN.algebra.com X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: xfce@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: XFCE List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-xfce List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D275487 --- Comment #7 from Mikhail T. --- Yes, the explicit setting of CONFIGURE_ARGS works just as well as that of MAKE_ARGS. Why is one better than the other, I do not know, but I don't hav= e to know -- I'm not the port's maintainer :) > But I feel adding a CONFIGURE_ARGS line is less invasive than adding a pa= tch. Full agreement here. > I also made the REINPLACE command silent, since this is the > common practice in the ports tree It being the common practice is hardly an argument :) I prefer such things visible to make it easier to review build-logs. But, again, this is not my port... --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=