From nobody Mon Mar 28 15:11:00 2022 X-Original-To: xfce@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B741A553A1 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 15:11:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail.madpilot.net (vogon.madpilot.net [159.69.1.99]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KRx3m44FNz3LhJ for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 15:11:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail (mail [192.168.254.3]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4KRx3Z1PNhz6dqX for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 17:11:06 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=madpilot.net; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:subject :subject:from:from:content-language:date:date:message-id :received; s=bjowvop61wgh; t=1648480261; x=1650294662; bh=WbwmNX 179edXOVQcoOKpjy+I5Bh3TDyCaTxT5cxDdjE=; b=iJzvRZ5G1HhagMQxBTTYBe 64QlWlplVKpU+nJHkROYvaQD/EnCQJ7fBHd1M2tFhwJQPF+UxtMKwlIXfHSX3tth aZRD37qpfl49b1dLE9O2RcNHsve8sSKrespgTYgfZHbxfFBaIkhRoeF0g6iEQz2m 55euoYlNLwL+voH9V0cJGUmN4CPDWW5HOHNmhgjL3C7CnsMqS3IQmLZSzn0JUU8V Dabss5NE8ODekis6tLlaDgRLGry5+D1iQ91qLa3qOYPZeM0Iwv+bguE/PQM15lAi zRPxqXQN41Dj4uh22DRn4Mqc+PI5PkVzzBc+bZ3c8Fl08H2GKgz7ZKjV/0qA4j8Q == Received: from mail.madpilot.net ([192.168.254.3]) by mail (mail.madpilot.net [192.168.254.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id V-dgdvaupY7L for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2022 17:11:01 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 17:11:00 +0200 To: xfce@FreeBSD.org Content-Language: en-US From: Guido Falsi Subject: Call for comments: bug 262883 - renaming xfce metapackage pkgname Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4KRx3m44FNz3LhJ X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=madpilot.net header.s=bjowvop61wgh header.b=iJzvRZ5G; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=madpilot.net; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mad@madpilot.net designates 159.69.1.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mad@madpilot.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[madpilot.net:s=bjowvop61wgh]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[xfce@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[madpilot.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[madpilot.net,quarantine]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[xfce]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:159.69.0.0/16, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N List-Id: XFCE List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-xfce List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org Hi all, As you may have seen a bug report has been filed suggesting a rename of the xfce metapackage. I don't feel like taking a decision on this matter by myself. Renaming a package has consequences for users that go against POLA, and I'm not sure a consistency change is worth the effort. I have stated my observations in more detail in the bug report: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=262883 I'm asking if other committers (especially xfce memebers) and xfce desktop users to please read the bug report if you have time and contribute their thought and opinions. I'd rather see this resolved with a consensus, since it's not just a technical issue. I really don't feel like making such a call by myself without asking others in the community. Thanks in advance! -- Guido Falsi