From nobody Mon Jan 15 10:19:42 2024 X-Original-To: xen@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TD7Rh5Nvtz56YML for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:19:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TD7Rh4KhJz43DH for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:19:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1705313984; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=c79MPRKNFXdaqcZn3swnstuzsy58YVwCMzNzX6Q1gaE=; b=Pp8gzcljE5qCnU1cyLXheyrRE0yysqUZGfPTr8m4hqArwtTXUzIFwMl4EPVAH4q6PVoWR8 V9anOqOR3bngYAIdkUPPQcNbaS6mpbsnG2rodbLrcEN7TYk0deZSiPG9nrKnF5MgB2/CAd LtYDLrzmzDr9YslWODhEIwLEfT8jS+y96yUMvCqLZIKuXMXx4Etj+iLCoJts0r3gafjr0B itcDXRF/tkSgxGFrZ1aAczMekBcr4NMTb79hNe9CM35phi4LxgAxEdXsDJ3orIFIQ5I/SB zFG4JTfBLOZWy5gnW/PWqdgs2IqwPCFvKPGdtbbEiJoGwRSrQ0BwuL0Lialk1w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1705313984; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=qkK58eg9mrxXs4lygPEvqXqWrkQIlk5AUfM/KL7+096oAdNOLMTs6RB4BwfnFk3IF0Jt2L pFY8MlKbePGw7xBoz3LkoCnV3FOxqHjxRGEH4sUzCIEmC2QuKwCfXHQ3hasXvUL0wNn3rw fYg7UB9OLbyCRrFPJtVZr4fiacw4AMB7G/gjGaSI1VGQ8P1llgI5uGkBFUlV1SDjXb9EsJ jYHaZ63DxqK05eFv8IJPeq2sPv6GRlC3a24IglJtLzFpRLZUFfBt4SUIUErqEkCEpxX6P0 sq2u+HAWJ7UzgoaF/EaELvmEJXNLEaXq/Wvgo7LRMbgJBh0Fm2lTGCc+l/ICsA== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TD7Rh3PPXzswP for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:19:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 40FAJiXs037708 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:19:44 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 40FAJiij037695 for xen@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:19:44 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: xen@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 188990] [xen] dhclient(8) does not accept DHCP Offer on FreeBSD 10 as Xen DomU Guest Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:19:42 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: royger@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: xen@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Discussion List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-xen List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D188990 --- Comment #26 from Roger Pau Monn=C3=A9 --- (In reply to Zhenlei Huang from comment #25) Thanks for the analysis. I think there either needs to be a way to signal that the package checksum should be ignored (and thus assume the checksum to be correct), or there mu= st be a point in the software stack where a checksum is calculated for packets that don't have one if further processing requires such checksum. Thanks, Roger. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=