From nobody Tue Feb 20 23:26:37 2024 X-Original-To: x11@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TfbC14XGNz59sW7 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 23:26:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TfbC11kfwz46p3 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 23:26:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1708471597; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=uu1p2WYlw8hJOoahcdN9tZ75d2RbLoq+SmZ++hYfq4o=; b=K/iaHUWIKi7VF9Xz2oFKUuR4HacoRVYGj62/rn0W5crMR01zMwgt9c2SNcYtX+d4dsudjs d1yxgmsmsLeo1hKKiwWnpreivdoETMPC5sPmap/YTeKnLCjKyI5ovjZTlWt7igK/w4unE/ KLkDE3luUfwDPnumbHqP3xGHQvctKYe+NGwBAt9h17bUnLqCpdYGl3knkUSETbGBGKeuOA /ZrRffiJto41Gm5nMKA4lUsndTw3Zt8XMXLFNImNdh+nEgFfRL2lfPScF/HzU8hYd6XTLT zx2Fr0HG+Ij1M37YfTXJoHoC3qpGbGZrN3S5HgMZx0wOfn+Dakk0EvQaMUl4Ag== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1708471597; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=CPyOM7zui2dGM/083hMKg++E2WvbJ6g1IRBhVTjjTHFJ0BTHBeepzdG5d2Lr75pfjCQjOi yJQ2NVGDMEWO0gSUuMmA7oTwkja0ViQ7k+QuyGdhoQlptQvGZNPXMXeLbdAd+vrL3JQzRV 2+Q4rNwUC3Ck9uhA88gmjCiA4G5WacjTh2EUpa9opPCizE/gH4h9HC0M4Zy9EHA0TdeF5A MVo5he8yH5g85pu1CtyCNauYZ3eoXSPLdNpd8Ke9DFiaLWf4dwPanCAXLTGi57zowQohgl 9jwII4Ud8b6E7nLWN3ZwMZFnItztzAkFdx25Z/y1H6Nw8TivNKoJg/vxD0M6YQ== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TfbC10kKWzfX9 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 23:26:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 41KNQbuI067284 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 23:26:37 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 41KNQbqx067283 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 23:26:37 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 277028] x11/nvidia-driver: Update to 535.154.05 with x11/linux-nvidia-libs, support build for beta 550.40.07 Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 23:26:37 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: X11 List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-x11 List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D277028 --- Comment #5 from Tomoaki AOKI --- (In reply to Graham Perrin from comment #1) Graham, from triager's view, which do you prefer: *Single patch containing every updated ports, for convenience to apply and ensuring everything needed are committed at once. *Divided into per-maintainer basis and set "maintainer-feedback?" per patc= h. Committer who is assigned to commit should need to confirm every patch has "maintainer-feedback+" (or maintainer timeout) and surely commit every patches without any fallouts, preferrably in single commit for build cluster to be sane. I'm going to prepare patch for ashafer's updated distdiles, but wondering w= hich way to go. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=