From nobody Tue Feb 20 23:17:23 2024 X-Original-To: x11@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Tfb0M6lB3z59ryY for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 23:17:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Tfb0M5X0Fz45Js for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 23:17:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1708471043; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1pd2lbUUC+NqyPcW96mCB22KuaegjtfESyRONqdhoPY=; b=v3IKmPlRlCAjBJPjLUKV1f7F8zIynySE3htf9UZJ3tzproXzSTlToN+XuIVKHpykeRZiyg elHf3Tj2NvzXUpX0ittohe0JJv9Wgij6+a6La8TEv0PAvcuIHy2Nw9o5s9hzjRC7wvzzgf CKkydyVv75EQEY+17OnvIN8qWNqIUFbTE2MeFMDf9m+MGT6HL7AgAqIke8pyLanDKe6TP1 +YmpR+Zp/8tHQkZqLGkOtu+sHbGxtDbLG05E/emlN90CRC8mJW19Aeh8PnCCrwukSt5EMO nm33bh7LpkbbENOULbn48GCHNCK2Y9fQcaulszVFop0YsF6YTVTa3xee6tcSvw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1708471043; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=YdF8t8xscs/qIjPC476/gSXDfIz2nU+VZc41j+ZUdX9YjEiXn5IJtiU7PJJr7RkVRl2CMq 1XTPTsahM0o8k8Veh5GGdIm9qt0+ZtFcCLyquDzOzcjgoDvoaA46NkqeKG2Gx0TTPJ866a xezJA18ZZBKCA0h4JwyO5JoF3GhSuuCP1mLVNAhMvs8YwI1OIKX1yLLyn84kYvYQUgYzK6 vQhFKYgLFCm4ZjwSHZ6xVThxTOQr2kRkkAVW970n1AkUfwnXHVQd4G0vRUvsf4dtl4x80I Zh/i+nM0dFDpts4phBnT+hR1czE0YlenrrGKmgQxg+l1MR9ArMSYmgY/1Ll4IA== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Tfb0M4V7PzdNm for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 23:17:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 41KNHNHB020152 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 23:17:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 41KNHNFD020151 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 23:17:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 277028] x11/nvidia-driver: Update to 535.154.05 with x11/linux-nvidia-libs, support build for beta 550.40.07 Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 23:17:23 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: X11 List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-x11 List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D277028 --- Comment #4 from Tomoaki AOKI --- (In reply to Austin Shafer from comment #3) Thanks for your update! Could confirm distfiles are fetchable. I can prepare the patch for graphics/nvidia-drm-510.kmod and graphics/nvidia-drm-515-kmod, but cannot even try building for now, as I'm waiting for ABIs of LinuxKPI affecting graphics/drm-*-kmod ports to be stabilized enough. Why I'm waiting is that many times, at past, I saw timeframes graphics/drm-*-kmod stop working, even worse, failing to build after LinuxK= PI updates until graphics/drm-*-kmod ports successfully chase che change. I do= n't want such a unfortunate timeframe, as I almost never experienced such a situation on x11/nvidia-driver. So, my question is, how do you think about the stability of LinuxKPI ABI/AP= I? Do you consider it stable enough? For a while, I didn't see the problematic timeframes on MLs and Forums. Yes, there are some screams, but later it turned out that they are using official pkg, instead of building from ports for actual kernels they are us= ing. But I still am not enouch sure it is really OK for now. Another reason I cannot test for now is because my poudriere jail is too bu= sy to rebuild everythin I've installed as of recent stable/14 bump. ;-) Thousands of ports are still waiting to be rebuilt. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=