From nobody Mon Feb 05 16:28:34 2024 X-Original-To: x11@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TTBdb0Zl0z58WV2 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2024 16:28:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TTBdZ6fH8z4NkQ for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2024 16:28:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1707150514; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=GsrCvKu6LxRy1Bx7cfw8Pg1SqvaH8sY2w3fk4KdPz7A=; b=pL4jZ2fj+eeWjoy6dVV7qYOVxd8FIhYndthdFWvg+5ZL+fXZLFvdB6oo+ROVp4VFpYKA4R vDwmdBP/4XFFxSa0Y4FZ1hjOOQLD5O1ltuuHDnBhWzkoMA0HvIt4Nnp92JJ3Bqkn9pmfey tdd3src6kI5sVUd9gq2IaDT9NY1Pu9pTubVmlYDdtss8M3PDDWO8/2OTxjTKY3Bma0fGTO GuuhCzfArDf3JneNs6t/cK/NYodaou2klG6wc3dNL+bp7zNlaoLaeoqCRVesLtWvAnnfo2 kMRWKKkcYAB6w0wXJ1B7kasStCIjMyekarCue+JhHWS9m3cDv0CCbpY8ue1uWg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1707150514; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=G2pvSgc7XwjGNvr1bytPklAn5H9W3K/965JvEILxAgRHbeTMk6JIoA63wfbdfQaLGWuMfo 8quLk533VS9K2F2qJAKNY8sXOjk/u6s1J4Kqa5423FIrIfBElQU6HilsxA+IPkssMYWym2 j4MLxfnjJxAkyxnRytSbML4xmQ1Ff8bMUKkvKWSnp9UodqReoBwrVVaThQfFtz1GNikZD4 xRMnGHb2V82J8qJXvrl/xkVFr0rFReCEAnQO+hGzQBsePqSY5veA5dIMmz/u8sI93LTKUc o2vSsk+HXIQBfHeQkb7uuSRjnaSBA194rg7cX/fRYoJJauN7DovgRBF5a/eF0A== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TTBdZ5dMzznLb for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2024 16:28:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 415GSYI6017575 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2024 16:28:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 415GSY0x017574 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 5 Feb 2024 16:28:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 276614] graphics/mesa-dri:fix os_same_file_description warning Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2024 16:28:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: rozhuk.im@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: X11 List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-x11 List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D276614 Ivan Rozhuk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|Works As Intended |FIXED --- Comment #16 from Ivan Rozhuk --- (In reply to Gleb Popov from comment #15) You are trying to marginalize me and what I do. It looks like this is your = best argument in defending your position. 1. I'm here because it is broken or absent. This means that upstream or/and maintainer screwed up. 2. I solve my problems exclusively at my own expense. (with rare exceptions when I do the paid work) If you don't like it, you can hire me and then you can tell me what and how= to do. 3. I am not interested in the status, achievements, merits and everything e= lse with regard to the personality (mine or opponents). I am here to solve a specific technical problem. 4. The whole system of ports is a set of crutches and hacks to allow softwa= re to be written mainly for linux will compile and work for freebsd. By calling my work a hack - you do not need to separate this from all other ports. 5. Before saying that the results of my work I use only me - study the question, 99% that you use the code written by me. The whole story with GFileMonitor has been and still remains an example of = how much the gnome community does not care about the FreeBSD of users and how m= uch the FreeBSD community does not care about its own users. This is a huge failure, for which all involved should be ashamed, but for w= hich no one was ever evened, and when they brought them a ready made decision in= the form of a patch, then the answer was: =E2=80=9CGive us this in the form of = a series of single line changes=E2=80=9D - this is just a spit in The face is personall= y to me, a bureaucratic trick. And here this patch hung years before it was turned on. I understand that for the gnome - FreeBSD is alien and they don=E2=80=99t c= are, but I don=E2=80=99t understand why the FreeBSD community is so insolvent that the= finished patch cannot just accept for years. > Just as I thought. This homegrown GFileMonitor backend isn't upstreamed a= nd I'm 99% sure there are no users other than himself. I will remove this o= ption once I find a time to convert libinotify-kqueue into a GFileMonitor b= ackend. 6 or 7 years have passed already, and you have just gathered to do somethin= g!? Here he is an example of complete failure. libinotify-kqueue is a good solution, only it is late for 8 years. Make sure your solution is not only easier to maintain but it also works be= tter before doing something. Because it seems that it doesn=E2=80=99t matter for maintainers how it work= s, it is important that it is easy to maintain. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=