From nobody Mon Feb 05 08:46:23 2024 X-Original-To: x11@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TT0NH5v59z59WHy for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2024 08:46:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TT0NH4GTbz4THM for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2024 08:46:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1707122783; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=VFKVGZN4rGBXh4V6EC6C8ZKGLjioxImgjyvi2IUE7F4=; b=pbo6OVgR1LefomF5ArYRXBZrHw93hW6Op4Bc2RQO7oyoVXoBcKoIfWXPvDlgYeqaK0+OKh JHVJ/HY2cOc3NGPUk8Dl09j6YR17C/4E8/dYS6KsOk61BeXPc21jI11bKqomALfMsY4obn UyE7h5zoWqzaF7SJoypdf+Db8irsd87wuFMOk3UHcQdcM9xkZWyCfOzXmJQc9M8xU/gUeE dGkfC0cL+XXXNKAzZpkdl0GA5QzU5CMJIK5z2d4RgT6m1ZITEt1c4XL1VV3Xx2vifgRL7T qHrAkZlZROtOR7kKYdw77LEF99rhzyoVNOIXUfKjBy2OFrp780WodN2dSKFoVA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1707122783; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=qHIiNDDUew6ZUjZHQCRAqrnvEmebSVWWzddo+9NhOgP7wkI3dvtbzJM2n4UTzaowvcewse QMDK8qogikTkNZAcsf7Z/9rYgbqNG450xm79B3tYM3vObbVNZn3Y77ShVh4DL6mRD8fbRr tUPmwDaQAbcVvWe5P7tOTpWjHz05mcFwRggrm+EAaDDX6Hrk3I1Qq/EuuXOUqgQgD4p52m RLlzu81z/kZya4W0fAonG7wI3sNjXAUqoIpq7kSzc++rVgfSGeAWUfqmamlaiDQxGgE4Xk JK9WtcxIKlZAcnQyRycKE4au6vxx5CPVJdvgKLZXpGyKJdJQdw5nnA7rDFx/hw== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TT0NH3LP5zZ84 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2024 08:46:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 4158kNlH099295 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2024 08:46:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 4158kNOq099294 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 5 Feb 2024 08:46:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 276614] graphics/mesa-dri:fix os_same_file_description warning Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2024 08:46:23 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: manu@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: X11 List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-x11 List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D276614 --- Comment #12 from Emmanuel Vadot --- (In reply to Alexey Dokuchaev from comment #10) > Yes, unfortunately, we've seen this attitude being exhibited more than on= ce. :-( > I'm with Ivan here, esp. given that he's one of our long-term desktop use= rs and=20 > the author of patches that make FreeBSD desktop experience smoother, whil= e=20 > support from our staff X11 maintainers is often lacking. Being alone in the x11@ team for the past ~2 years, I think that I done a pretty correct job at maintaining the ports while still continuing to help people with drm-kmod when problems appears so this comment is hurting me a = bit. Also I use FreeBSD as my main desktop for 20 year now so don't think I hate desktop users :) > Turning away people like him would be a big loss to the project. > It is generally bad to dismiss contributors, let alone threatening them w= ith a ban. It is generally good to dismiss contributors with aggressive attitude thou= gh. > Now that being said, can we (all) please get a little more constructive h= ere?=20=20 > I can understand Emmanuel's unrest with having to maintain some ~100-line= patch. Maintaining a patch isn't the problem (even if I want all patches to be upstreamed ideally), the main problem is that this patch wasn't reviewed, wasn't accepted upstream (unlike the use of kcmp(2) which was merge yesterd= ay) and I don't plan to review it. Having kcmp(2) is an improvement, not a bugf= ix (could be wrong, feel free to correct me). > Maybe there's a less intrusive way to not scare users until kcmp(2) becom= es omnipresent? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=