[Bug 271533] x11/xorgproto: ensure Xos.h does not define index() as a macro

From: <bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Sun, 21 May 2023 09:14:03 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271533

--- Comment #3 from commit-hook@FreeBSD.org ---
A commit in branch main references this bug:

URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=e5a0215417930a60ac8fbbc630fad6aa354446e5

commit e5a0215417930a60ac8fbbc630fad6aa354446e5
Author:     Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>
AuthorDate: 2023-05-20 15:15:41 +0000
Commit:     Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>
CommitDate: 2023-05-21 09:12:30 +0000

    x11/xorgproto: ensure Xos.h does not define index() as a macro

    During the exp-run for clang 16, it turned out that Xos.h defines
    index() and rindex() as preprocessor macros, and this causes many
    problems with libc++ headers [1]:

      /usr/include/c++/v1/variant:532:39: error: too few arguments provided to
function-like macro invocation
          return __at(__fmatrix, __vs.index()...)(
                                            ^
      /usr/local/include/X11/Xos.h:67:12: note: macro 'index' defined here
      #   define index(s,c) (strchr((s),(c)))
                 ^
      /usr/include/c++/v1/variant:813:18: error: too few arguments provided to
function-like macro invocation
          return index() == variant_npos;
                       ^
      /usr/local/include/X11/Xos.h:67:12: note: macro 'index' defined here
      #   define index(s,c) (strchr((s),(c)))
                 ^
      /usr/include/c++/v1/variant:817:25: error: expected ';' at end of
declaration list
        constexpr size_t index() const noexcept {
                              ^
      /usr/include/c++/v1/variant:802:9: error: member initializer '__data'
does not name a non-static data member or base class
            : __data(__tag), __index(__variant_npos<__index_t>) {}
              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
      /usr/include/c++/v1/variant:808:9: error: member initializer '__data'
does not name a non-static data member or base class
              __data(in_place_index<_Ip>, _VSTD::forward<_Args>(__args)...),
              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      /usr/include/c++/v1/variant:920:23: error: too few arguments provided to
function-like macro invocation
                __rhs.index(),
                            ^
      /usr/local/include/X11/Xos.h:67:12: note: macro 'index' defined here
      #   define index(s,c) (strchr((s),(c)))
                 ^

    Add defined(__FreeBSD__) to Xos.h's #if block to include <strings.h>
    instead, so it will get our regular index() and rindex() declarations
    instead. This has also been sent upstream [2].

    [1]
<https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/gohan05/data/mainamd64PR271047-default/2023-05-14_19h35m09s/logs/errors/scim-1.4.9_7.log>
    [2]
<https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/proto/xorgproto/-/merge_requests/73>

    PR:             271533
    Approved by:    manu (maintainer)
    MFH:            2023Q2

 x11/xorgproto/Makefile                            |  1 +
 x11/xorgproto/files/patch-include_X11_Xos.h (new) | 11 +++++++++++
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)

--- Comment #4 from Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> ---
Note that in the mean time, upstream has applied my merge request:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/proto/xorgproto/-/commit/6c3a7302fcc7ecf05960ad1794c5effeda5d4945

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.