From nobody Wed Mar 29 18:50:57 2023 X-Original-To: x11@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4PmwcL26ZNz42wNB for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 18:50:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PmwcK5rG4z3Pmx for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 18:50:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1680115857; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=kNWdXcBQ4NLt2n2c66ZPF12gLveHSkD6lo2mZ/S/cAg=; b=C0bj7tDyvWCHMVOoLDNiSvM0BPQh7Msw55jtWdi9mrOv6j3TLoEGwew7VTrxBpwjuVGl26 H7S5Pae2jUmo6zzZVtl2syxwK/P+bD00D3IpIP+i1UkDDbZr4JGugmdBrV+gI0UABGLfLl 1Y2vUMVadSdohBPj1+l9O9z+xgOqq+XTGudCF+QdIM5/u+Q0JteJZpKaDzC7X/enA5hoLq 0LwUQNV7ihtjqb91DF2IwOi8FHzYynP+3ZS0D4AE2JmHDs2buSTAtSnzsPOeSEfyTrOGP8 ndH2x2PwAd2RO+hnDsISgK1L4srSSqydXShiOBPYc581jrtb5jy3m6V9ZvZNpQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1680115857; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=modkvLDHVWco2z3acQ0eSnJ/9bupNJ09FBuSNyFwbu6/u5+o+XxZGKJ9lP87iIocLFY9+T cMN5DJl1UMsMmUxOs+OjFXBdj9az9Y57kKiENL7ggStR990UcUuHHckn8zxYueJNBRTAKo N7QPDmFPOa8kQT3GTYiAVfVsNL2OSuywbsYW+CMwhnOrsLgyKXQZkL3p0nnlD4Zg5YtSUR 9A6VpEViFp/kbuJTVn7crvALSKIQ2wOB5o0ZuKIMRVl5McJ3VNZ2svzn1vq3WX6Ix8Iyz2 /9HKF0KKHa4NnncUFiWm+k+uGmEeoG6p4phHebaeglSi3jX55eAUc0gV3kA0gw== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PmwcK4vDhzhVL for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 18:50:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 32TIovFK054406 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 18:50:57 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 32TIov5h054405 for x11@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 18:50:57 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 270509] x11-servers/xorg-server: After update 21.1.6,1 -> 21.1.7,1, vesa fails Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 18:50:57 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: marklmi26-fbsd@yahoo.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: X11 List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-x11 List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D270509 Mark Millard changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |marklmi26-fbsd@yahoo.com --- Comment #1 from Mark Millard --- Which should it be: "vesa fails" (not UEFI) vs. "for scfb" (UEFI)? vesa is documented to not be appropriate for UEFI. scfb is documented as being appropriate for UEFI . . . https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/handbook/x11/ reports: "VESA module must be used when booting in BIOS mode and SCFB module must be used when booting in UEFI mode" There are separate ports: xf86-video-scfb xf86-video-vesa The little bit of material that you present references both. (Be warned: I'm no expert in the area. I'm just repeating material that I read.) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=