Re: Changes in drm ports
- In reply to: Jan Beich : "Re: Changes in drm ports"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 02 May 2022 16:12:43 UTC
On Mon, 02 May 2022 18:06:49 +0200 Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> writes: > > > Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> writes: > > > >> - For (futur) 13.1 users the default drm kmod port will still be > >> drm-fbsd13-kmod (tracking Linux 5.4) as long as 13.0 is supported. But > >> you also have the option to install directly drm-510-kmod in case you > >> hardware isn't supported in 5.4 > > > > Why keep drm-fbsd13-kmod when it can be replaced by drm-54-kmod? > > Note, both drm-fbsd13-kmod and drm-54-kmod are based on Linux 5.4 and > even have identical GH_TAGNAME. The main difference is SOURCE option and > unblocked -CURRENT in drm-54-kmod. > The SOURCE option is the main reason I didn't removed it as some people still uses it. I'll send a mail a bit before 13.0 is EoL as a warning that this will go. But I could change the drm-kmod metaport for 13.0 to use drm-54-kmod as it's mostly for package users. Will probably do that this week. -- Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> <manu@FreeBSD.org>