Re: smr inp breaks some jail use cases and panics with i915kms don't switch to the console anymore
- Reply: John Baldwin : "Re: smr inp breaks some jail use cases and panics with i915kms don't switch to the console anymore"
- In reply to: John Baldwin : "Re: smr inp breaks some jail use cases and panics with i915kms don't switch to the console anymore"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 20:25:55 UTC
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 11:56:35AM -0800, John Baldwin wrote: J> > J> So there are two things here. The root issue is that the devel/apr1 port J> > J> runs a configure test for TCP_NDELAY being inherited by accepted sockets. J> > J> This test panics because prison_check_ip4() tries to lock a prison mutex J> > J> to walk the IPs assigned to a jail, but the caller (in_pcblookup_hash()) has J> > J> done an smr_enter() which is a critical_enter(): J> > J> > The first one is known, and I got a patch to fix it: J> > J> > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D33340 J> > J> > However, a pre-requisite to this simple patch is more complex: J> > J> > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D33339 J> > J> > There is some discussion on how to improve that, and I decided to do that J> > rather than stick to original version. So I takes a few extra days. J> > J> > We could push D33340 into main, if the negative effects (raciness of J> > the prison check) is considered lesser evil then potentially contested J> > mtx_lock in smr section. J> J> I think raciness is probably better than always panicking as it does today. AFAIK, today it will always panic only with WITNESS. Without WITNESS it would pass through mtx_lock as long as the mutex is not locked. So, do you suggest to push D33340 before finalizing D33339? -- Gleb Smirnoff