From nobody Mon Sep 09 06:25:22 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-virtualization@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4X2GzX62Zdz5VrWq for ; Mon, 09 Sep 2024 06:25:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from void@f-m.fm) Received: from fhigh7-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh7-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.158]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4X2GzW6Yycz4JXs for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 06:25:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from void@f-m.fm) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=f-m.fm header.s=fm1 header.b=vdP2YH2c; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=UX1udge3; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=f-m.fm; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of void@f-m.fm designates 103.168.172.158 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=void@f-m.fm Received: from phl-compute-11.internal (phl-compute-11.phl.internal [10.202.2.51]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607BF114018E for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 02:25:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-01 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-11.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 09 Sep 2024 02:25:25 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=f-m.fm; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1725863125; x=1725949525; bh=alPXeGbAmZpGRxVk7LAfDNKkLWlEl79o GzJ9YYjastY=; b=vdP2YH2cz0NU3NCRT2kMcsegUettgF4GeFIiSumh756dGRQb CZBtA8GfaG5GFw69rDWMGFzQLyspEW/Qxd7fdV99TKLQgSx8C9ybWR+oKCTECqIm OJvkuicGzDER+flS1xdoZV3OMmyfKgfttHWstrSRcf0K92MOxbWcuIvlRsiPb50P gxh77E9SrrwfcyFncKA4OVuz+aWTDM83gqWEWQgAi7DsWaEbIzaeLo9ZhV33jJG6 0BnUr2Jc0knjpu34HJ9wT/LlDo4/KHCBpv+bT1tbVvdhs501xTs352To5NK9uqqu FqYu+yB0E1YMz4+BmoQdlkHog/Wj5+zEqY2DNw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1725863125; x=1725949525; bh=alPXeGbAmZpGRxVk7LAfDNKkLWlEl79oGzJ 9YYjastY=; b=UX1udge3oLNWLqzqbS4FIZon6xYdvc0WotlG5zwQ9qOgQ7t8xIk uyDqafNsyRSDurt+33eyGqBVJqpzVwfUBjo4s1BxrWt49C/xSwFKRS/nVSsrjkXm enlERKF29EW71i1pClkZz56AXLIt/KzMG1Z+PYLX5psiDbU5oG68jjXQeD0r9HSh qyk+3kzcalx6+qHu862Yb95jgP5Pw7W9MMXgx3PWZgp/0NGt4Zz6u5keOhQ46w43 7o29iPBzGO383AaIHhkJmFUs+oeU0+Bp/ewwHNu+cK7oMsY642q2IysyzWfw+4xM lCrJmw2nvO1PB1SbxVAntyiwM3EUFFn/kdw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrudeiiedgkedvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfu rfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuf fkgggtugesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvhhoihguuceovhhoihgusehfqdhmrdhf mheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhephfelgfettdelgedtjefgkeeuffffvdekledtudeghf dvhffhlefgjeetfeduheefnecuffhomhgrihhnpegtohhnfhdrihhsnecuvehluhhsthgv rhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepvhhoihgusehfqdhmrdhfmh dpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepuddpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtohepfhhr vggvsghsugdqvhhirhhtuhgrlhhiiigrthhiohhnsehfrhgvvggsshgurdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i2541463c:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 02:25:24 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 07:25:22 +0100 From: void To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: is it usual for azure-agent to spam the console? Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussion List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-virtualization List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.55 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.95)[-0.950]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[f-m.fm,none]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:103.168.172.128/27]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[f-m.fm:s=fm1,messagingengine.com:s=fm1]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[103.168.172.158:from]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[f-m.fm]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[f-m.fm]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[f-m.fm:+,messagingengine.com:+]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209242, ipnet:103.168.172.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[messagingengine.com:dkim] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4X2GzW6Yycz4JXs Hi, As subject:- is it usual for azure-agent (waagent) to spam the console? The vm itself appears to be working fine, but it waagent sometimes spams so much that getty pushes the load over 1.00 I've set Logs.Console=n now in /usr/local/etc/waagent.conf. Is this safe? Is waagent usually so noisy? --