Re: [RFC] virtio testing framework
- Reply: Emil Tsalapatis : "Re: [RFC] virtio testing framework"
- In reply to: Tomek CEDRO : "Re: [RFC] virtio testing framework"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 22:19:13 UTC
Can someone explain to me what the purpose of what you are talking about ? On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 10:38 PM Tomek CEDRO <tomek@cedro.info> wrote: > Awesome!! Congrats :-) > > Here is some example of running NuttX RTOS on RV in a web browser using > TinyEMU + VirtIO :-) > > https://github.com/lupyuen/nuttx-tinyemu > > -- > CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info > > On Thu, May 30, 2024, 22:16 Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com> wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> while developing a virtiofs kernel driver I have written a debug >> virtio transport to test virtio drivers inside a VM without requiring >> nested virtualization or support from the host. The transport allows >> paravirt devices to be emulated in local userspace instead of a host, so we >> can create paravirt devices and test them as necessary. For virtiofs in >> particular, it allows us to reuse the existing FUSE tests since we can now >> run both the virtiofs driver and the FUSE server (which is normally in the >> host) in a single machine. >> >> I have uploaded the WIP code [here <https://reviews.freebsd.org/D45370>], >> and an overview of the design [here >> <https://gist.github.com/etsal/4280b6f16c1815d64ffda7ecce0b66f5>]. The >> patch has a ways to go, and currently only supports virtio-blk device >> emulation as a PoC, but feedback is welcome and appreciated. Please also >> let me know if there is interest in using this for testing other virtio >> devices apart from virtiofs. >> >> --Emil >> > -- Mario.