From nobody Sat Jun 29 17:48:55 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-virtualization@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WBKZ43mY9z5P8mK for ; Sat, 29 Jun 2024 17:49:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@ny-central.org) Received: from mail2.ny-central.com (mail2.ny-central.com [173.212.246.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WBKZ31mkyz3xHd for ; Sat, 29 Jun 2024 17:49:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@ny-central.org) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=ny-central.org header.s=202405 header.b=LdnJ9DJj; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=ny-central.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@ny-central.org designates 173.212.246.2 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@ny-central.org X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ny-central.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mail2.ny-central.com 6FED21B07A5 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=ny-central.org; s=202405; t=1719683368; bh=1VEUcYLlNZ8FFR0xK9qLzBO+CC6R9CFDIMJ/68ZQ6nQ=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; z=Date:=20Sat,=2029=20Jun=202024=2019:48:55=20+0200=20(CEST)|From:= 20Chris=20Moerz=20|To:=20FreeBSD=20Virtual ization=20Mailing=20List=20|Su bject:=20Re:=20OS=20Images(Linux/etc)=20in=20ports=20tree|In-Reply -To:=20|References:=20=20<28dd6abb-5868-e42a-c385-37e72653ba2d @ny-central.org>=20=0D=0A=20; b=LdnJ9DJjE2pxzzyAlACdDA3k5YAJziqr667Uk9G5sYQIeHq32klqPJgDifzI2w4sr yrWXXuVyHAab+rBYgKG/8bef6aVL3F7Uq/UiudK5B7m1qb+j2NIHX0Dbrdp9hejbwJ 26Oz48s0vO50KKk5PajIKOg3gwpQGDmIhuANiQ5F5AycWgr3QueUzrM1ovoDHXMljK 3GlQHrRjOXiuK/WmdJwUPPm/qy3kE6aeMaNC3gKoQnnzw/OifmLqdpuQ/vwe4L4H58 N5WbYB7pmXI2Q5nXco1VLavHX+FT5p9x8tHi66QaAS++rjCMGIqrPsu3suQ03xLhc/ a2m/J+yTFxB9kQej17wJF9Xf52H+It2pFV++OdVY//DcfuLG8sQAGoDVlfrvO+1H3w xaY6l5DxEeTgigjOG6tEFhdarYr8GxQ6JDAM+PiHN4MT9IbtfNu/KPE1ki6CziN0rl OastsPDNpWM/aG+ACL0KNiMLfC5/hW+bEZggQhhEsc1DMqnRpLAD260gZilitOcPm8 M76mvJYEy7cMi5wheoss+ogKbLBSlljWbs+30Evm7jtXcxFh2H8BXoVZCnlVCPI+wg 3XK1zgs2HNw/hpJjEpracIMtE+zC8dZXSFf9vgHmQtj4a9q7z/N6hecWubqsnO1nE3 u63a7WmZEteRYElThvieS18Q= Received: from tenforward.ny-central.local (unknown [192.168.11.104]) by mail2.ny-central.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6FED21B07A5 for ; Sat, 29 Jun 2024 19:49:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 19:48:55 +0200 (CEST) From: Chris Moerz To: FreeBSD Virtualization Mailing List Subject: Re: OS Images(Linux/etc) in ports tree In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <28dd6abb-5868-e42a-c385-37e72653ba2d@ny-central.org> List-Id: Discussion List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-virtualization List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-26) on mail2.ny-central.com X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.90 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.998]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[ny-central.org,none]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[ny-central.org:s=202405]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:51167, ipnet:173.212.240.0/21, country:DE]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[ny-central.org:+] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4WBKZ31mkyz3xHd On Sat, 29 Jun 2024, Mario Marietto wrote: > I think that it may be possible to put only the VM config files on the ports,not necessarily heavy image files. > You're all making a valid point; I second that - I read the original post as if we're talking about scripts that download images from somewhere else. May have jumped to conclusions. We can probably all agree: OS images do not belong into the ports tree. Porting scripts that handle OS image creation or downloading them from some public repository though would certainly be fine. chris