From nobody Tue Dec 03 00:01:12 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-virtualization@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Y2LRg4Nlwz5gflG for ; Tue, 03 Dec 2024 00:01:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marietto2008@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pj1-x102b.google.com (mail-pj1-x102b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "WR4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Y2LRg0y5mz4LKt; Tue, 3 Dec 2024 00:01:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marietto2008@gmail.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: by mail-pj1-x102b.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2eb1433958dso3237402a91.2; Mon, 02 Dec 2024 16:01:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1733184109; x=1733788909; darn=freebsd.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=LzVbMjnAJLfT5GEcKj4q0ZWktsfP/pYZZ5ODSJhDxG8=; b=gr5RdBlpAf1VKJA5YXk3RERAsyl8u4EzBDQ9GyBkG54O1GFwooZ2TC0wSKvckybOd9 E0YQ+3wTzEBOy1eqziHXWNrSHWFp2y2a+qM/BZCq6PpZz9VeC6tp3RlQWAgq9GCgi95r J/zD8jiLt3gb71BDzlxSA/nWlsY+2o2hsjwYR8spFK1zZm38V+pBC/MM7jBUzOpRmVYL bBWf2l9R2fm0fX34uz3jsS9uFrWq9bQwt/4ixNdmvJRNarh1cWrGB/5mX5QT+Gfc5fY8 EzgHaHoFJRmOUe0fyieGvHlB6wcOTS8+WVxMJF9/kOJL7GI0XCM4tF3Zi5TpwaoJIQd3 Kf2g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1733184109; x=1733788909; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=LzVbMjnAJLfT5GEcKj4q0ZWktsfP/pYZZ5ODSJhDxG8=; b=AGGTpP/jbzWr18o0a0mnJQWWeuUdUr6BLtSZJhN3VrfOAYxm856D2OT9Js/N9i/Rhx 5DhRALUycG+SkC0DhHbtQaAUC5zYis8t9zm7szGTFQ6ukHz4TzkW/8hhKKzQB9ZkKvRI RqvV/4gBfSFlCrvKbHUufH8Y9SEiEXJmKSnKEydEz+FhXmXHYaF30WADy0tgBPp93zHR 55nd0cX2U+v7pkSu/TFHtieDDAa6hWzDo/Zbmly928rBzjKiKMoGwYe5wWMMY9D6kpJm 7JkiiV+CER1w55j0VEGLN2g3u29xON1IrxYIGtLqJ2RJtNir+WnKmPIghcxILnuN5DrT hm5w== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWPTmQMo86HSBn0UC50v4VkRrU90ZcLxnTLT4twNypnkcbfQ+cb17g4GJM6w4zLE9xr27mE65CF/ZrBA3Tpi4CBM/m3NI0c@freebsd.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz2fqlvGggc4iA4X2CX1l0WZmut3oGpTuMTurlbpztfntGGzOQO ZQ8Cd65COeszeqx2hV6kPgZG4OVrxyAok0gGpY5nVEqaQZ6GcF56Dk6le4Rx4pENtQ1FjKJg0zI JDD+OGVkLXulS3nnP/IRhUuE2FubtOFhwO/Y= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctyphTjek67QZy7GdYBZrWwYDK5nSQjKWq2oMkbR0STKC1JjX59FKT8K7OO/GF URyjqfLS6C6PlbAOu4zcRD1VwLYyDnvoh+s8ovxOe2xROpuh4dA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFe5q7Mdjxdlgz4r8hvqbuKmLZhuZFKoFjghtyjSbjtyNCHNxIBmToAOuU+lZkZHaQe3PrE6g3lKdAkQztDeb4= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4ac8:b0:2ee:ead6:6213 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2ef012152c7mr828811a91.19.1733184108699; Mon, 02 Dec 2024 16:01:48 -0800 (PST) List-Id: Discussion List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-virtualization List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Mario Marietto Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 01:01:12 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Failed to emulate instruction sequence [ 41f646040874064c017d88eb144c89 ] at 0xbea5fcf9 To: Mark Peek Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Corvin_K=C3=B6hne?= , FreeBSD virtualization Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000212a980628525ff1" X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Y2LRg0y5mz4LKt X-Spamd-Bar: ---- --000000000000212a980628525ff1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable --> Please read the bug I mentioned (comments #1 and #2) where the submitter only compiled a new vmm.ko and it didn't work without the corresponding bhyve. This is the reason why I asked : Can you offer a quick technical explanation of the reason why the exchange of the modules does not work for me ? and you didn't give me any answer. There should be no need to recompile vmm at all,because the first thing I did was to copy vmm.ko,bhyve-win and bhyve-lin from the UFS system where the problem is not present,to the ZFS system,where the problem is present. I have recompiled vmm.ko only for the sake of my curiosity. On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 12:49=E2=80=AFAM Mark Peek wrote: > On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 3:34=E2=80=AFPM Mario Marietto > wrote: > >> --> Did you use the new bhyve binary you built from the patch ? >> >> I didn't recompile bhyve,since I don't need it. >> > > If you want the fix applied, you must compile and use both vmm.ko and > bhyve using the patch. The patch is used in both. > > Please read the bug I mentioned (comments #1 and #2) where the submitter > only compiled a new vmm.ko and it didn't work without the corresponding > bhyve. > > Mark > --=20 Mario. --000000000000212a980628525ff1 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
--> Please read the bug I mentioned (comments #1 a= nd #2) where the=20 submitter only compiled a new vmm.ko and it didn't work without the=20 corresponding bhyve.

This is the reason why I aske= d :

Can you offer a quick technical explanation o= f the reason why the exchange of the modules does not work for me ?

and you didn't give me any answer. There should be no= need to recompile vmm at all,because the first thing I did was to copy vmm= .ko,bhyve-win and bhyve-lin from the UFS system where the problem is not pr= esent,to the ZFS system,where the problem is present. I have recompiled vmm= .ko only for the sake of my curiosity.


<= div>

<= div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 12:49=E2=80=AFA= M Mark Peek <mp@freebsd.org> wr= ote:
On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 3:34=E2=80=AFPM Mario Mariett= o <marietto2= 008@gmail.com> wrote:
--> Did you us= e the new bhyve binary you=C2=A0built from the patch ?

<= /div>
I didn't recompile bhyve,since I don't need it.

If you want the fix applied, you m= ust compile and use both vmm.ko and bhyve using the patch. The patch is use= d in both.

Please read the bug I mentioned (commen= ts #1 and #2) where the submitter only compiled a new vmm.ko and it didn= 9;t work without the corresponding bhyve.

Mark=C2= =A0


--
Ma= rio.
--000000000000212a980628525ff1--