From nobody Thu Oct 03 08:22:08 2024 X-Original-To: usb@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XK4R500Glz5Xx25 for ; Thu, 03 Oct 2024 08:22:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XK4R45hWNz41C1 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:22:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1727943728; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=RG7+rkTZMRokGohxjykMyGMmHI8lJXzBxf/1i7PurUw=; b=rBEkcv67zE/+Cf7GJw989VyE78FTOLMqPApt0IQVicGq8oVjDlBg3OY10+uK8XGXSDRzXP +GYTCnezH6VE3422k3XRV8UbqHaq6dwUq3DXtorHJ9mqjG5NJg3s3tMPMOIoEnfC5Rti48 okzOuT5SA981hvT9ly2nCWJdD3KFkX9ufCNFcjt2UOEdItIMXOY9WwiZKYbjXJ2EqPDTor +rARr4Y1hoJaeCFvPRnjKzaRaTAnrWJB9RI1G2IHUQp5shPLVGypvgCP7RdLKY6AQuGh52 NaewIpOclR50kJjN0COT5/ekJnc9QyZ6Icqe5gQ7Ue/iQyiLpGNiytaGoOF8cQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1727943728; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=SFnucWaTH1uW2QMHlOlr9dTNgJlQ8dIQGAgT4cL7bt7+oy0540oaw5qbBrmK26W/lpyrXN Bvq+5L6GlguooX9J0Yg/ZscbhkCD9lvm8xoQKLeIMOiEvqp0a3Axx5rKNxYRGwzOh7u64P 6X9stU0YYJ1Yqi/EQUsPxBGaJarTGMyuCkJG2BMoh7sYlpAd8UzW7HG8qeZs7AUOQkq7rY eNWcAIhCZcpQRQs2JKozmyP1kTFhK4L7mZV6l7+Hgf0BNDxbXWvJtw1VshvXHnRtCKtIYH XktwLDeXXqVWzwKyo8RcvS76ygjTLad9hCD+gowgpEBoJmlBIVx8RGE3TEZTHg== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XK4R45HFQzjWK for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:22:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 4938M8ko055227 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:22:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 4938M8Dn055226 for usb@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:22:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: usb@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 247964] Low read throughput on Sandisk Extreme external SSD Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2024 08:22:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: usb X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, performance X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: thj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Overcome By Events X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: usb@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-usb List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D247964 Tom Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Open |Closed Resolution|--- |Overcome By Events --- Comment #4 from Tom Jones --- I bet it is still relevant, since 2020 I've (and I'm sure other people) encountered lots of bottlenecks in the usb stack. However, when someone com= es to look at this I am sure they will take "usb storage performance" as a test workload to evaluate. Also I don't have a x270 anymore, it is not a modern platform we should be expected to maintain. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=