From nobody Sat Oct 12 13:10:32 2024 X-Original-To: toolchain@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XQkPj0kmHz5YMm5 for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 13:10:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XQkPh4dw5z4hm9 for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 13:10:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1728738632; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=vfBYovwGxtZth3PpDtSAFnU+taiZ4jOfaIgw3xV/PtY=; b=YJJItsqIUYpbAwZOfR7EE8evKEAqUq0zKsoSVcgoSCKv/3c14B77SjmLWXAJNKmDpWgTtq zbGbBU7LRPhzIGAeoji6bopAIjVrYl1X/wIvA940Z1piXvQ/W1ef9nCh2TlV2jxLIgYSYY YJ1M1incpVttGUpn9h5hU+P78dxFPI+OKOUEuPyDm9NC264YSpszKPkMgp3mpNo2WOyJLC qAn9WVaU+KIyvBlSgXHqK0n2U/E7ckFrwQoW/y6scxoOgfA4dYGvVVuP+SqC++VWYJgct1 FYO7v3/GHExumo9YrJJCEz/q0BrWdJ7h7b3UYp89sM1x+fpWKhx1CuLBx5xUsw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1728738632; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=QRPNpb1PhDH1il1Culmr64nDew28QYaW0yYFX+0AZgLkAGwrH9ZJd7g5OFUHUe+HqgShEM 1eFxNKH+DHc5Td4crOUmn4S6blVnpYn5FN8i734r8om00waJzoDIZC2wclHe0xWC6UmE8E zjqSQwAWImmkujFA8zhh19EoYdWtEqYdV57PXu52BqZiqZzrpk82Oc7E673aEuEIJ0je5d LC8ZSt/ri4rXgPCLGAi0fQ+Ur/nSjMT544DBgsvrcytGifB9HehEVtoUOvY/Z6gX3hR/LB nI4eQnHf7g0okzmAlA+gve1Mbaztyn0OWOsZXwj3j1FRkw0Uh9kVIFWOQQHU2A== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XQkPh45T1z1QN6 for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 13:10:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 49CDAWRC010279 for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 13:10:32 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 49CDAWxS010278 for toolchain@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2024 13:10:32 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: toolchain@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 281765] llvm - ThinLTO never uses more than a single thread by default Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 13:10:32 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: marklmi26-fbsd@yahoo.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: toolchain@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD s integrated toolchain List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-toolchain List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D281765 --- Comment #9 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to Dimitry Andric from comment #8) Just for the 16 limitation sufficiency: Using the more extreme example context . . . 4 linker threads on a 2 GiByte (or even less) armv7 that has 4 cores --and if multiple makes run that each run ld? Process size limitations count here. In my view 32-bit contexts should likely single thread the linker. (Personally, I impose that limitation based on the size of void* .) 64-bit has more opportunity for RAM+SWAP to avoid running out of memory space. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=