From nobody Sat May 25 07:20:09 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-toolchain@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VmYG332BMz5MMgC; Sat, 25 May 2024 07:20:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VmYG32XX0z4VcX; Sat, 25 May 2024 07:20:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1716621611; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ADccrqccjckvseECY9463PWqHzIewuywd3bfb1RU81Y=; b=bKavT/0yPyK9raPUQUINPQGmxGUlrfVeqzOjbzDzrdMNHlnsMkJIJFHcrOV0ue5CU0Erny Jfep56bJAdWA4GlwUHYCJLEsaG1HeanszJOvLiz8NmqxHCVfiJrNF4067WF3DebvNi7gbF hBu80mPanfDEMFdoei7GBTMDj+kcD8rEW4CfGT3o/r65ygIodyJvj46OZfx+aJE/mzbM+6 iDGJRmOtbU6wMhyGutf41JzLx8qgoGqe5PAyajYl57npC1Uh0Cxjob3d+mq6nLJVkA+YHz mN8XI5ObhUVWpF5ASQQZNlMDxkBy+KHlY8Np0M0orXIugX2j6kfSBGg+t3DDmg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1716621611; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=KSq0caOkOVOU09d0tE4l0UKQn3XoKolSlxbmGDrGLk2UNGgS/jrY47allNDD03ITVs7tYr HHy/7ft9JN0988+4XCxDxs0tsB/C0Lq2RSjN8VRONlqpuihdEvpHf1XbFm/TmqLEFBFLRH CQT4ozj5WDbMVVEFgXCOpsQkGhKuhHE86jKu+GsN4/urKSud1iPXHzDXgSA4ec0yIGy9ER PsoVGVGsu4nHdWMf1i/q7G1HZl+BmiltVOquBskDNqyEQT120JoLDHZEJRq57LsDh0DzQ4 uMuo4oK7llWm4M5d9E8DvY2NXm9m9Dcbitudqc/0maiIy+kOu6rmm/b6PutJeA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1716621611; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ADccrqccjckvseECY9463PWqHzIewuywd3bfb1RU81Y=; b=llipPtQuuZ/j7flgLRT0gu+daErqmal8aHAoMwEbzZJ8k2bYEdVM0BPMBkAGwEdI/F21WF fNLgYbc45bHlG62wBQPwZNWwO5fvw9zQBpIMVMe50II18WUlYRRPmInfQmT/sRkWUvSUjj TvEYPY1pXSvqE8hIAMSZd6RvpL04+BCBkFFKxsmYc/NDLiCVD/FUSzOUaYQWYTIi/Fn1ao i1Go+Kx+2RFDxnD9nMce154nn4N2RKKDKuWlchQHEqUrVHXhhYXW132Vnlrifm64Ot0KJh PCRYpUMdYw7zzS+E5bbwqDEkUW+OotDL7lJvkXzV48tPEXLyJEuTT33S6KQ0mw== Received: from ltc.des.dev (unknown [91.174.26.112]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: des) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4VmYG31QqKz1K18; Sat, 25 May 2024 07:20:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@freebsd.org) Received: by ltc.des.dev (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A13263269F; Sat, 25 May 2024 09:20:09 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Brendan Shanks Cc: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using standard C headers from LLVM/Clang In-Reply-To: (Brendan Shanks's message of "Fri, 24 May 2024 09:14:03 -0700") References: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 09:20:09 +0200 Message-ID: <86plta5pee.fsf@ltc.des.dev> List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD s integrated toolchain List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-toolchain List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Brendan Shanks writes: > My question for everyone: should the Clang C headers be used instead > of FreeBSD maintaining its own? No. > Is there still a philosophical reason for FreeBSD to maintain its own > set of C header files? FreeBSD is a complete operating system. Toolchains come and go. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@FreeBSD.org