From nobody Sat Jun 01 05:49:09 2024 X-Original-To: toolchain@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Vrpvn2ZMdz5MFGN for ; Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:49:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Vrpvn1QwGz4P63 for ; Sat, 1 Jun 2024 05:49:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1717220949; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=DhbYvjVecyp6AKeFj6wIk/dzzUOxhwq1QHntBZ/+CilsqYbjH5G5d3qAomxCtePu0JulNo rg8SVv3GttVZTTssEReozhHIsG6C7iWEOXde3WTmX5CanQWnK2wzDVFymEDw2fEX2TFW1S 35byAOTYd99MZkNwgUViTqZc1KlfbZR3g40EefKpgwsoDCFQYpYmYgNifCE4NXImABZZ3R 1xd2o2NBrZM6du56iC0AmPRFq42CdHJPTwq54VVWxeVq3QCyLRO3Ch0qM3j/9xOs4WSTBX t+KrNoWudgU5YrkbagOS2UXNN5PEI4T4scKqsE0ZT9clp3R6qTgDg9cAsbolTw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1717220949; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ck9epozgVLE8Pf7MmnlaLhWt1rb6XzaL4KDHAf1CV4g=; b=uQ8vxT1pxSTSWHHs9EDmC7w259Vjpa2VjCUF9sa1bRIZwl7Aa3w0fj2exXgcfOV8cAS5Jb rgO8GCWOYsLK6nCAwDnXLdjN9w8AMVKffFnuy7iAjVtUFKHyGgkFDe8UcUKQN/9dqzBdZB /jk9T/J5QbEI+O86e7IErI0KLcQZK6dD0tUNihczJq1op1aw87lcdRbdYHwbuUxG0YwhnA fXgLjdCerFdCD9AS4jgvqhPOV/zGvO0ROFNxhVakKBusb4hBRqVeg73/qk/h7Kx52YZ3YL jGSZ1/2wEsx+27sgcQqdTH6nyvhpE1McTPxvCdnK+zPLRbXmrRcurWLAL7rjGg== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Vrpvn0zwYzvrh for ; Sat, 1 Jun 2024 05:49:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 4515n9ij013447 for ; Sat, 1 Jun 2024 05:49:09 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 4515n9DP013446 for toolchain@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 1 Jun 2024 05:49:09 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: toolchain@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 279443] LIBCPP assertions are enabled in optimized builds when -DNDEBUG is given to clang Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2024 05:49:09 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: misc X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: pjfloyd@wanadoo.fr X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: toolchain@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD s integrated toolchain List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-toolchain List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D279443 --- Comment #13 from Paul Floyd --- (In reply to Mark Millard from comment #9) (In reply to Mark Millard from comment #9) The original comment said > It should be possible to get an address of the end of the std::vector obj= ect, even though it doesn't point to an allocated byte. This is precisely the purpose of std::end() (or std::vector::end(), std::en= d() has the advantage that it will also work with raw arrays). > I kept to a fairly minimal > style change compared to &buf[cb] and what it means in C and > some parts of C++ for my test example, using notation showing > specific distinctions that other C++ notations could hide and > so be less clear.=20 As I see it you were using idiomatic C to show how to do the wrong thing ra= ther than using idiomatic C++ to do the right thing. It looks like Yuri is getting things sorted out. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=