From nobody Sat Jun 01 04:32:01 2024 X-Original-To: toolchain@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VrnBp0fGYz5M7v6 for ; Sat, 01 Jun 2024 04:32:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VrnBn6MZqz4HhW for ; Sat, 1 Jun 2024 04:32:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1717216321; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=lj03SHO/66wv6khf+sbnBnjNbngcID/ODRfQrHFUpLuBAyoJBv6VHvK6vf+HIBROpzfQDG Hyr3rmAjJAlj3oTE9RCE66cEaa0+R8C6EteBxagPvLgyATx0Hez/1d8oMMKxR/xbHeD/7A 6A/pHp9P5yNZhSemSkgs47byOiTh//p4sZPT2A3amFxG7U7EN+xwpfcLNtlPHpRstO3gfL HanilrvqUCxRVz3z+D+ra90QKhUUrDh/6MnYCxvCnATp4e6XvkuOKbPLqI7QoBgFQD1G3S TsrNeRaLg8zXWDOElkQf7Mxs1U1/zU/CnxHIplFSU1tm8+kHj/tS7lsQZay7Pw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1717216321; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CH/A11mU36FttB9+WvQutG6rgwPTs410C81F8qGTDNA=; b=Il0zZ+eN+n6CuA8ZnNrOTxUMBvtUHYkVUWocMBU9RXggnB+OJoK+ajRBrjtFN6gj6dc7dj 5c4KaXJoGoQ6EOFwRo4UyRYZgC3prrKOtScpkbCVFkKQY1pLURx7yUgixSDfbwznZFKVBB 8roMfwHRoWQJwoWdJg/dgrSmF1lIBvcB+E4TCVb949vgB4cmAY7U6mMuC44ERJAgyiZkyW 1pNdi0y2zQJDlxGd/L7ORZO80W6RzND/MrGTALmu+6+CrQqw7tdwibndxw8N6Hhdnow5YG 7Hdn2ezD5spL20jbDu4yVWNgC49ABMMQjWp4WTasK+fuC4O91UTZ94qDJLyCCA== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VrnBn601xzt35 for ; Sat, 1 Jun 2024 04:32:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 4514W1O8065279 for ; Sat, 1 Jun 2024 04:32:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 4514W1ko065277 for toolchain@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 1 Jun 2024 04:32:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: toolchain@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 279443] LIBCPP assertions are enabled in optimized builds when -DNDEBUG is given to clang Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2024 04:32:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: misc X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: marklmi26-fbsd@yahoo.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: toolchain@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD s integrated toolchain List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-toolchain List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D279443 --- Comment #9 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to Paul Floyd from comment #7) Yuri had specified that the code was analogous to upstream for devel/hpx, if I understood right. I kept to a fairly minimal style change compared to &buf[cb] and what it means in C and some parts of C++ for my test example, using notation showing specific distinctions that other C++ notations could hide and so be less clear. I was making no claim that such was the best way to rewrite the related devel/hpx source: a limited purpose example. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=