From nobody Tue May 28 03:12:29 2024 X-Original-To: testing@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VpHct2PVvz5LPRX for ; Tue, 28 May 2024 03:12:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VpHcs5m3lz4Skh for ; Tue, 28 May 2024 03:12:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1716865949; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Y4x4WPii9acN5Ti72vFlMf0iwF9sY13+oC+s68Pw8PIY9LcCY1qKqZf5nPoaKrvzvRiu/E iv7gBN1c62YV4YL6mI/qLiw3iVvzttFC/cSyRM+SEr38vBJgt5s6VRQLDvQh2oUjM3e7hk KXyq+iEW2jf/4ew+OF/lm0265+i63wr6GtlKYg5L5sRrvq8N60IbBd3p/CA5y0FYZd2Al7 pqHpPoRUaa2XVk34TDNFzNd49BZDMiUIT8mWQbJ2NRqQTxxO4ojAz/ppsGhzzDj15gzaBX jz2L+nvTGrGCusoSIb82cd7SXgAASLm95oLXJdtu0JXroH55ukAw9Niq8Y8nPQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1716865949; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=E6KgSg8pTZdmUUrlurX8F29bvEy8ff9fTvxfZoJhV0c=; b=LvpsTrMYVBUuSwzqxgdHpDx75pk/2rRZR4rwjav+QyrAmmcJcWMX3Sp/ZGtQSyA5n7saUd 09Sdc37yD06Pu8CydFfhCyq6wy9Gjv/wAIommTdSJdyF0jIK1xiy5TaPxaIoRlT9FqYK0s 8YtG3Si4x0CQ0+K0ZWczlJFlamyu7C3WpJE0lr0BpTj1mILNHPxSX39DZBBsmp8yz3+4St TtVV0GJo2jZzX+mQCdG3aulaK796aTpEVDTq7mjB8+WO+u4szBEbZf92cLpDQTkE2pwk+x aIXAI+XKEh25l6fowkNFgAGL1crn6lbn56Scs/S2xLH3kVhUFtf+h0F+XdGlWg== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VpHcs5MlYz19Zj for ; Tue, 28 May 2024 03:12:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 44S3CTDo099732 for ; Tue, 28 May 2024 03:12:29 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 44S3CTsu099731 for testing@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 28 May 2024 03:12:29 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: testing@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 279354] New test kern/unix_seqpacket_test:random_eor_and_waitall reliably fails Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 03:12:29 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: tests X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: glebius@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: testing@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Testing List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-testing List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D279354 --- Comment #1 from Gleb Smirnoff --- That's because SOCK_SEQPACKET indeed is buggy. The test was committed together with new implementation d80a97def9a1db6f07f5d2e68f7ad62b27918947. With that revision test reliably doesn't fail. However, the new implementa= tion had three issues: aio(9) incompatibility, lack of sendfile(2) support and finally krpc(9) incompatibility. In my private branch I have already covered all expept krpc. This one is really tough. Anyway, the plan is that the new implementation gets finally back into the main branch and won't be reverted. You can assign this bug to me or just close it. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=