Re: new kyua import
- In reply to: Mark Johnston : "Re: new kyua import"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2024 03:04:49 UTC
> On Jan 2, 2024, at 4:04 AM, Mark Johnston <markj@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 03:26:49AM +0100, Moin Rahman wrote: >> >> >>> On Jan 2, 2024, at 2:41 AM, Mark Johnston <markj@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 02:37:01AM +0100, Moin Rahman wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Jan 2, 2024, at 2:35 AM, Mark Johnston <markj@freebsd.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 02:29:38AM +0100, Moin Rahman wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jan 2, 2024, at 2:23 AM, Mark Johnston <markj@freebsd.org> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It looks like the kyua repo here has received a number of bug fixes >>>>>>> since kyua was last re-imported back into the base system. It looks >>>>>>> like neither the base system copy nor devel/kyua in the ports tree is >>>>>>> being kept up to date with https://github.com/freebsd/kyua. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In particular, we're missing a fix for >>>>>>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273481 which is >>>>>>> available in github. That bug is causing occasional failed CI runs. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Would anyone volunteer to import the latest version of kyua into the >>>>>>> base system? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I am not a src committer but if you want I can create a separate port >>>>>> for that. jmmv@ has been mia for a while and our fork is ahead of the >>>>>> original one. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you, but is there really a need to add a new port? Can we just >>>>> switch to https://github.com/freebsd/kyua as the upstream? jmmv/kyua >>>>> has not gotten any new development or bug fixes in a long time, and I >>>>> cannot see any other places where kyua development is ongoing. >>>>> >>>>>> Kind regards, >>>>>> Moin >>>> >>>> We can wait for 2 weeks for the timeout then. :) >>> >>> Sounds good to me, thank you. I don't use kyua from the ports tree (and >>> I don't think our jenkins does either) but other folks may be interested >>> in the update. >>> >>> We still need someone to do the import into the src tree. I can try but >>> I'm not experienced with vendor imports, and I don't particularly want >>> to change that. :) >> >> >> Do you know how to submit a review for a vendor tree import? It's easy >> importing but I need someone to review it. As it is totally a seperate >> tree it is difficult to submit the review itself. Although the commit >> for the merge might be submitted for the review. > > You can upload arbitrary diffs to phabricator, so you could diff the > tree before and after the merge and upload the resulting patch. And > maybe push the merge somewhere to let others take a look and verify that > it appears to be done correctly. > > I'm also happy to test the import (probably not until late this week > though). Okiz I will do that. Kind regards, Moin