From nobody Tue Mar 14 21:35:53 2023 X-Original-To: testing@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4PbmzY4lq3z3ylx8 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 21:35:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PbmzY3kPVz3sBg for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 21:35:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1678829753; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=D2AOl47rd1ghkmoSL6Bh+DBXfwXWBUPuhttPZgVJCUo=; b=C0lvsnw0Gb+cdfwWASw0R44v0qght2+/RzWjYXYc5F7Qc795LINpJot815/NjFqqwI0uxu Z6qDU/3gPTNYMr0MTtjMho0TF6S9B6dk396cy/smFj7R7VBn2kYd/21jcagll+UuEIh+pb w9oGEmonolpj9GgxRyF90SPB5wr1uzieqrI/fCXuNXTMI6Dv0sB6WrL+Fnhheulrg/XYNL esPt/xACbnh3fzZHCi5so4SfnQ2pGLymdS7bXh1dkOnIIeXsAUb8E9AA176+Wysf+PhpcN 1qIcsXGEGHQHslJ8nWz2S2Jjym72evv6IEzoP8lL3C2uDofm9McpnrguGCN/sA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1678829753; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=woYv3VRoIKTxeKrJNZEy6mjBAUWtLy5hmU7V7TN4+G+PBhbvmPP7Eai4QDgHs5zk/oCZrU ExcYeVkjVQz9yVkZqmo9cTsCTSGQXMFg/W9FgQg1qJDPpn/KI7IuszvoR4UA0ALVzmeO3i 7706LSfFGcf3iJfQNY+F6fOvwyynRzeRFRAj4G4tcunVLQ2Dll5SSVyL8BFWHbqyhXF0AG dpk7jCIH53001XCKfSFjXri7UaulcIilDty7DKYTATOVfYKqzhlPLOSYBdSAPiVusH4rKW XDSioSd9weBYOgRNGqy24rk1nWEJqfSOu+EOYOMtPxP6awaMC6lThUBSb3csKg== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PbmzY2jJhzrR5 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 21:35:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 32ELZrBs002600 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 21:35:53 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 32ELZrMe002599 for testing@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 21:35:53 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: testing@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 260547] sys.netmap.ctrl-api-test.main fails in CI Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 21:35:53 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: tests X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: testing@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Testing List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-testing List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D260547 --- Comment #5 from Vincenzo Maffione --- I see there is a duplicate_extmem_options() test that checks for duplicate options... So I guess we would make an API change if we returned error on duplicate options. I'm not against that, since I also do not see reasonable use cases for duplicate options and I doubt there is people relyin on that in the wild (modulo possible errors). I'd better include Giuseppe Lettieri who implemented the option support, to= see if he has suggestions. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=