From nobody Tue Dec 24 20:27:35 2024 X-Original-To: standards@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4YHmfH2wb9z5hnp8 for ; Tue, 24 Dec 2024 20:27:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4YHmfH1pqRz4Hkc for ; Tue, 24 Dec 2024 20:27:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1735072055; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=OdojrAMx4tykqrB/+Ew3lISQJTYQFj2W8eshgqCNCuA=; b=nUp5o8xkdstwugL7NbDy/s2py1gbikr2Vt8bLfe2qDX8KrdCvawOvHLVP1FxnV45DcVosr pI1CxiX41x/TJJrYqkwNzFdJZLsdRScYbZPxwHbAD5mzLA5x5I/lHAAK6GaoHUpajSkvwD uaY28m+PRC8lOyfaJrCr1dLfd7zoD0ypku/uHJMCQ/KK2KclFalMDiVtDaN0K/sqOH9KVp 1SVSTRC2W1JKIXKmQYe0+3yJWp08cwdq/35SzEkAKF1q8KQ21zHfKsOEsuEJpo0zLDbo+8 QhJ+Pt7+tZbHn4vnuZIFRYtgDqWcqP/eywGHpQ+pQ39++LYnNKHs5FqyFZMuMg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1735072055; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=c2gjLBNUgXOcCMRWjVDrTIlYyDRqaQsNQbXZF5Z/AmDidD2Go5xT3J07oqA1qwwqZH6Lcd mXTNE0df1zqiRuIKx3MISPn4/TJAYaN5VoyBjkp4S6yrofQbICdzW1D5czksDd3VE64bcc 2c7fQ0KJexSKzQs+EyVi7VfA2rWQacP8tmEeR5c55oEiTU3Cuo2ut5jrJ6a6B/Fbd/msSF JuX1Mz/sYZyF96uaQ9y1OVYdRWlfuJNeZPKWq95312sUuN5zHXhqsXZuu1zgEiDPjBYzWS wUEh75Oijd0BJFFLtELjsIj6sxTias+HPBpX7fU97jmrj8J6g7NKmbfiPLWiLg== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4YHmfH1NmBzttw for ; Tue, 24 Dec 2024 20:27:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 4BOKRZcd033935 for ; Tue, 24 Dec 2024 20:27:35 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 4BOKRZoD033934 for standards@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2024 20:27:35 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: standards@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 230330] _SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN reports offline CPUs Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 20:27:35 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: standards X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: marklmi26-fbsd@yahoo.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: standards@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Standards compliance List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-standards List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230330 --- Comment #13 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to Mark Millard from comment #12) I should also have referenced the footnote content for the descriptions of: _SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF _SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN It was: =E2=80=A0 The nature of an execution unit and the precise conditions under = which an execution unit is considered to be available, or can be made available, or = how many threads it can execute in parallel, are implementation-defined. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=