From nobody Mon Jul 15 08:41:07 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WMwf92BFMz5QQZj for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:41:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jason@tubnor.net) Received: from mail.tubnor.net (mail.tubnor.net [103.236.162.16]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WMwf81mpcz4r9d for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:41:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jason@tubnor.net) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tubnor.net; s=20220915; t=1721032867; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=QIT50sdUrjL0baZiXhpRT537mHaWl09fqQa+N8XtqFw=; b=S0CeKCEnVX9ELNXveg99IlcCjwdD+bwx+KdkVmvd/AMjOvPFI/r4a6HjnUJmACgdobJnCd LxW88fjUqp2xVbeCa1euOn/5Li7dY/TYOKCrJCHGeB04iAmmYHo8pn5KYv7oXf7EiPh87L z8speJoRXfQ49YAtISRnLRSrJxuRqH4= Received: from [IPV6:2403:5812:73e6:1:9027:c672:210b:50b3] ( [2403:5812:73e6:1:9027:c672:210b:50b3]) by mel01.ar18.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id c3b22763 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Mon, 15 Jul 2024 18:41:06 +1000 (AEST) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------9hZ3ONBn9Gi0sAlLBwBHRgUS" Message-ID: Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 18:41:07 +1000 List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-stable List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Possible bug in zfs send or pipe implementation? To: Garrett Wollman , Rick Macklem Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <26259.12713.114036.564205@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> <26259.17366.276955.824313@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> <26260.24797.484878.694868@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> Content-Language: en-US From: Jason Tubnor In-Reply-To: <26260.24797.484878.694868@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:133159, ipnet:103.236.162.0/23, country:AU] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4WMwf81mpcz4r9d This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------9hZ3ONBn9Gi0sAlLBwBHRgUS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 15/07/2024 9:35 am, Garrett Wollman wrote: > I'm currently running syncoid with `--quiet`, which removes `pv` from > the pipeline. It seems to be moving along, but of course I can't > easily tell what it's doing. > > Without `pv` in the way, the process reading the pipe is `lzop` > instead, which doesn't try to do any fancy select() stuff, it's just a > normal filter reading data from stdin and writing compressed data to > stdout, in sequence. I'm having the same issue here. I thought it was just my hardware and/or syncoid that was having this issue on 3.5TB dataset replications. I'll try the quiet mode to see if removing PV solves the problem. I'm also using compression=none so I won't see lzop. Cheers. --------------9hZ3ONBn9Gi0sAlLBwBHRgUS Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


On 15/07/2024 9:35 am, Garrett Wollman wrote:
I'm currently running syncoid with `--quiet`, which removes `pv` from
the pipeline.  It seems to be moving along, but of course I can't
easily tell what it's doing.

Without `pv` in the way, the process reading the pipe is `lzop`
instead, which doesn't try to do any fancy select() stuff, it's just a
normal filter reading data from stdin and writing compressed data to
stdout, in sequence.

I'm having the same issue here. I thought it was just my hardware and/or syncoid that was having this issue on 3.5TB dataset replications.

I'll try the quiet mode to see if removing PV solves the problem. I'm also using compression=none so I won't see lzop.

Cheers.


--------------9hZ3ONBn9Gi0sAlLBwBHRgUS--