From nobody Fri Jan 05 23:05:17 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4T6K0J3f4Wz56KBP for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2024 23:09:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org) Received: from uucp.dinoex.org (uucp.dinoex.org [IPv6:2a0b:f840::12]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "uucp.dinoex.sub.de", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4T6K0J2Cgvz4ctw; Fri, 5 Jan 2024 23:09:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from uucp.dinoex.org (uucp.dinoex.org [IPv6:2a0b:f840:0:0:0:0:0:12]) by uucp.dinoex.org (8.18.0.2/8.17.2) with ESMTPS id 405N951X087184 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 6 Jan 2024 00:09:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=uucp.dinoex.org; s=M20221114; t=1704496148; cv=none; b=L+cWNSkTYvoBMUAWyefc0efRkUzMNLV1+SCG2ZDNT844BEmq6zre/m/MgUXlrID1z+Wnum7xSXrmk+0Kq8Cjj9ZnndtZIYnrIZj8kLFkXf7wFztfAqLIx2KQKsKCZITzWIDyWdi+Gzhom9bf9Dr1piReU79gBVUNGzu573a1qO8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=uucp.dinoex.org; s=M20221114; t=1704496148; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HQejeDDwgxdp68fcZ9kbse/PLJTOdSDf9CJqIx/2464=; h=Received:Received:Received:Received:X-Authentication-Warning:Date: From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:X-Milter:X-Greylist; b=VafE9ZPMi0wrqTTXLOwdji3MtFaLent6/zdFKTwJM17avtoX+Vvmb25zBP0IsHaNuf4DXYLDHU1F9J17Uoc++fCbRG0v8BVBy0tpOGspeN3GNeHoymVDZWfzFs93TRDrWAmyPtQ5PriWifxHeEPDzqVXB40r3X3ugrge3CSC7pk= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; uucp.dinoex.org Received: (from uucp@localhost) by uucp.dinoex.org (8.18.0.2/8.17.2/Submit) with UUCP id 405N95ex087183; Sat, 6 Jan 2024 00:09:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org) Received: from disp.intra.daemon.contact (disp-e.intra.daemon.contact [IPv6:fd00:0:0:0:0:0:0:112]) by admn.intra.daemon.contact (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 405N8H9N057736 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 6 Jan 2024 00:08:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org) Received: from disp.intra.daemon.contact (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disp.intra.daemon.contact (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 405N5H6W006782 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 6 Jan 2024 00:05:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org) Received: (from pmc@localhost) by disp.intra.daemon.contact (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 405N5H38006781; Sat, 6 Jan 2024 00:05:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org) X-Authentication-Warning: disp.intra.daemon.contact: pmc set sender to pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org using -f Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2024 00:05:17 +0100 From: Peter To: Cy Schubert Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, bapt@freebsd.org, alfix86@gmail.com, asiciliano@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports-mgmt/portconfig surprize Message-ID: References: <20240105155617.03436679@slippy.cwsent.com> List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-stable List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240105155617.03436679@slippy.cwsent.com> X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: uucp.dinoex.org; Sender-ip: 0:0:2a0b:f840::; Sender-helo: uucp.dinoex.org;) X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (uucp.dinoex.org [IPv6:2a0b:f840:0:0:0:0:0:12]); Sat, 06 Jan 2024 00:09:08 +0100 (CET) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4T6K0J2Cgvz4ctw X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:205376, ipnet:2a0b:f840::/32, country:DE] On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 07:56:16AM -0800, Cy Schubert wrote: ! ! This should have been posted to freebsd-ports@. Next time use the correct ! ML. Hi, I was thinking -ports is for malfunctioning individual ports. Whereas the matter at hand is about general infrastructure (every server needs some ports) and deploy. I currently have no idea where to find the people interested in that, but the port options setting being unconditionally interactive is a conflict with any automated deploy. I always have to hack and refactor this - and that new tool doesn't improve anything (in that regard), it just adds some malfunction (and forces me to understand the new code). But okay, when I'm in a relaxed mood again I will try and do a writeup of the issue and send it to -ports. Let's see if anybody there is interested... cheers, PMc