From nobody Sun Sep 03 04:33:28 2023 X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Rdf654Mdfz4sG91 for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2023 04:33:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Received: from www121.sakura.ne.jp (www121.sakura.ne.jp [153.125.133.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Rdf651BBPz4S7w for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2023 04:33:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from kalamity.joker.local (123-1-88-210.area1b.commufa.jp [123.1.88.210]) (authenticated bits=0) by www121.sakura.ne.jp (8.16.1/8.16.1/[SAKURA-WEB]/20201212) with ESMTPA id 3834XSDI061826; Sun, 3 Sep 2023 13:33:28 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2023 13:33:28 +0900 From: Tomoaki AOKI To: Jake Freeland Cc: Warner Losh , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List Subject: Re: Is there any plan for ZFS and timerfd updates on stable/14? Message-Id: <20230903133328.54577b85b097da319ecde4ba@dec.sakura.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: References: <20230903123028.4ffceb705824f86d2efc21e3@dec.sakura.ne.jp> Organization: Junchoon corps X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd14.0) List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-stable List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7684, ipnet:153.125.128.0/18, country:JP] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Rdf651BBPz4S7w On Sat, 2 Sep 2023 22:47:53 -0500 Jake Freeland wrote: > On Sat, Sep 2, 2023 at 10:40 PM Warner Losh wrote: > > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 2, 2023, 9:36 PM Jake Freeland > > wrote: > > > >> On Sat, Sep 2, 2023 at 10:31 PM Tomoaki AOKI > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi. > >>> > >>> There are discussions about deadlocks issue of ZFS on freebsd-current > >>> ML, starting from [1] last month. > >>> IIRC, at least some fixes (candidates?) are merged to main, but not yet > >>> to stable/14. > >>> > >>> Upcoming (aleready released? or still rc3?) OpenZFS 2.2-release seems > >>> to have most of them. So my 1st question is "Is there any plan to > >>> import vendor/openzfs/zfs-2.2-release into stable/14 BEFORE BRANCHING > >>> releng/14? > >>> > >>> And one more. timerfd is added at last-minutes BEFORE stable/14 is > >>> branched, and already have not-yet-MFC'ed fixes [2], [3], [4] and > >>> Differential revision D41600 on Phablicator [5] related to memory leaks > >>> and locks. > >>> Additionally, splitting out lib32 part to proper place is proposed > >>> as D41640 [6]. Both [5] and [6] are accepted but not yet landed. > >>> Also, D41641 [7] proposes namespace pollution adjustments. This can be > >>> optional? > >>> > >>> Memory leaks and improper locks can lead system to security issues or > >>> deadlocks, so it would be benefical if landed and MFC'ed BEFORE > >>> releng/14 branches. > >>> > >>> Is there any plan to do so? At least, existing deadlocks should be > >>> considered as SHOW-STOPPER and resolved. > >>> > >> > >> The plan is to get all of those patches in before releng/14.0, I believe. > >> > >> What are your thoughts, Warner? > >> > > > > Sounds like the reviews are done or nearly so. I've not had time to look > > closely to be sure... I'd planned on making time Tuesday morning. > > > > Yes. All reviews are good to go. > > Jake Freeland Glad to know. Thanks! Looking forward to see them landed / MFC'ed before releng/14 branches. Regards. > > > > > > Warner > > > > > >> Thanks, > >> Jake Freeland > >> > >> > >>> > >>> I myself am bitten by several deadlocks on poudriere full builds after > >>> upgrading base from stable/13 to stable/14, finally finished with > >>> increasing kern.maxvnodes after powercycle on each deadlock and > >>> continue. > >>> > >>> > >>> Thanks in advance! > >>> > >>> [1] > >>> > >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current/2023-August/004162.html > >>> > >>> [2] > >>> > >>> https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=02f534b57f84d6f4f97c337b05b383c8b3aaf18c > >>> > >>> [3] > >>> > >>> https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=5eab523053db79b4bd4f926c7d7ac04444d9c1da > >>> > >>> [4] > >>> > >>> https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=f4296cfb409a48de00bfa60e76f686c2b031876f > >>> > >>> [5] https://reviews.freebsd.org/D41600 > >>> > >>> [6] https://reviews.freebsd.org/D41640 > >>> > >>> [7] https://reviews.freebsd.org/D41641 > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Tomoaki AOKI -- Tomoaki AOKI