Re: uname -a has changed?
- Reply: Daniel Braniss : "Re: uname -a has changed?"
- In reply to: Daniel Braniss : "uname -a has changed?"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 14:01:43 UTC
On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 03:47:21PM +0200, Daniel Braniss wrote: > im running latest 13.2-stable and just realized that uname -a is missing some info, like version, date, source > > 13.1: > hms-00# uname -a > FreeBSD hms-00 13.1-STABLE FreeBSD 13.1-STABLE #10 huji-13-f44f97837: Fri May 6 10:37:35 IDT 2022 danny@hms-00:/home/obj/hms-00/h/rnd/git/stable/13/amd64.amd64/sys/HUJI amd64 > > 13.2: > pe-44# uname -a > FreeBSD pe-44 13.2-STABLE FreeBSD 13.2-STABLE huji-13-e0ed1dd5d2 HUJI amd64 > > did I miss something? By default (IIRC), stable/* builds support "reproducible builds." The output of "uname -a" from a reproducible build lacks artifcacts that are specific to that particular build; rather, it should be identical to a build done from a different machine (using the same sources -- and of the same architecture). To restore the information (for future builds), append WITHOUT_REPRODUCIBLE_BUILD=yes to /etc/src.conf. (For further details, see src.conf(5); look for "WITH_REPRODUCIBLE_BUILD".) Peace, david -- David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Casualties: Boston Massacre: 11; 06 Jan 2021 Capitol insurrection: >140 See https://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.