Re: SIGILL when CPUTYPE set to anyting witjh avx and CFLAGS -O2
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2023 20:31:10 UTC
On 12/29/23 21:20, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 09:12:35PM +0100, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote: >> On 12/29/23 18:00, Dimitry Andric wrote: >>> On 29 Dec 2023, at 11:14, Harry Schmalzbauer <freebsd@omnilan.de> wrote: >>>> >>>> at least since 14-release, I can't compile base/ports with CPUTYPE post nehalem. Any '-march' declaring AVX(*) capability leads to SIGILLing binaries with default -O2 CFLAGS. >> .. >>>> >>>> If I compile without CFLAGS -O2 ("CFLAGS= -pipe"), -march=skylake-avx512 the binary doens't crash with SIGILL. >>>> >>>> Is CPUTYPE supposed to stay untouched these days? >>> >>> Obviously not, but are you sure your target CPU is correct? If it is not, the compiler may insert unsupported instructions. >> >> Ho Dimitry, thanks for your attention! >> I have to admit that I know much too less about contemporary compilers and >> CPUs likewise, but target CPU matches -march ;-) >> I nailed it down to AVX instructions. Starting with 'sandybridge', Intel >> CPUs provide avx instruction units, and starting with CPUTYPE?=sandybridge, >> binaries crash on stable/14 (and late 14-current) on the corresponding >> machines. But only in combination with CFLAGS -O2! >> >> >>> In any case, for the above gdb session, try the command "disassemble" to see which particular instruction it crashed on. That may give more information. >> >> Thanks for the hint! >> This came out: >> Program terminated with signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction. >> Privileged opcode. >> #0 0x000000000041e040 in init_yank () >> (gdb) disassemble >> Dump of assembler code for function init_yank: >> 0x000000000041e030 <+0>: push %rbp >> 0x000000000041e031 <+1>: mov %rsp,%rbp >> 0x000000000041e034 <+4>: vpxor %xmm0,%xmm0,%xmm0 >> 0x000000000041e038 <+8>: vmovdqa -0x202c10(%rip),%xmm1 # 0x21b430 >> => 0x000000000041e040 <+16>: kxnorw %k0,%k0,%k1 > This is AVX512 instruction (some of it subset, probably F), not AVX. > ... >> Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1275 v6 @ 3.80GHz (3800.00-MHz K8-class CPU) My bad, sorry. Confused machines. This indeed was wrong target CPU, stupid me. Previously I tested tih CPUTYPE?=haswell, which editors/vim survives currently. Will run a base build with CPUTYPE?=haswell over the weekend and report back. Sorry for the noise so far... -harry