From nobody Mon Dec 04 13:48:52 2023
X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
	by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4SkQ4W3Ds0z53Npq
	for <freebsd-stable@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org>; Mon,  4 Dec 2023 13:48:59 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd-stable-local@be-well.ilk.org)
Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4SkQ4V4G8Nz4gxj
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon,  4 Dec 2023 13:48:58 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd-stable-local@be-well.ilk.org)
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
	dkim=none;
	spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd-stable-local@be-well.ilk.org has no SPF policy when checking 23.30.133.173) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd-stable-local@be-well.ilk.org;
	dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=ilk.org (policy=none)
Received: from lowell-Ubuntu.lan (lowell-Ubuntu.lan [172.30.250.95])
	by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6252335D63
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon,  4 Dec 2023 08:48:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: by lowell-Ubuntu.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147)
	id 486AC10804D4; Mon,  4 Dec 2023 08:48:52 -0500 (EST)
From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-stable-local@be-well.ilk.org>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Errata Notice FreeBSD-EN-23:16.openzfs
In-Reply-To: <ZW2P8xz046Eqo_0u@fc.opsec.eu> (Kurt Jaeger's message of "Mon, 4
	Dec 2023 09:38:11 +0100")
References: <20231201031737.DF0231B942@freefall.freebsd.org>
	<ZWsI4SbNU2xPjaPF@marvin.hueftgold.tld> <ZW2P8xz046Eqo_0u@fc.opsec.eu>
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2023 08:48:52 -0500
Message-ID: <445y1eaxiz.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-stable
List-Help: <mailto:stable+help@freebsd.org>
List-Post: <mailto:stable@freebsd.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:stable+subscribe@freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:stable+unsubscribe@freebsd.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.60 / 15.00];
	NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[0.998];
	NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.977];
	NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.72)[-0.722];
	MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain];
	RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[];
	DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[ilk.org : No valid SPF, No valid DKIM,none];
	PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-stable@freebsd.org];
	R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[];
	FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[];
	MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
	RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2];
	ASN(0.00)[asn:7922, ipnet:23.30.0.0/15, country:US];
	TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[];
	FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[];
	MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-stable@freebsd.org];
	TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[];
	R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record];
	RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1];
	MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[];
	ARC_NA(0.00)[]
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4SkQ4V4G8Nz4gxj
X-Spamd-Bar: /

Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org> writes:

> I had thought that the ZFS fix is a kernel fix so that the kernel
> would also report -p1, but it does not. It might be because
> zfs is a kernel module, so the kernel itself was not really patched,
> but I might be wrong here.

As far as I can see, that seems exactly right.