Re: panic in zfs(?) on stable/12
- Reply: Juraj Lutter : "Re: panic in zfs(?) on stable/12"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2022 09:33:44 UTC
My choice would be to test the memory and try 13. BTW: What checksum algorithm are you using? Something standard or a more obscure one? Regards, Ronald. Van: Juraj Lutter <juraj@lutter.sk> Datum: 13 juli 2022 10:08 Aan: stable@freebsd.org Onderwerp: panic in zfs(?) on stable/12 > > > Hi. > > every now and then I’m getting: > > panic: vm_fault: fault on nofault entry, addr: 0xfffffe01d9620000 > cpuid = 5 > time = 1657698436 > KDB: stack backtrace: > #0 0xffffffff80c2e775 at kdb_backtrace+0x65 > #1 0xffffffff80be4ba8 at vpanic+0x178 > #2 0xffffffff80be4a23 at panic+0x43 > #3 0xffffffff80f63b1b at vm_fault+0x20fb > #4 0xffffffff80f61920 at vm_fault_trap+0x60 > #5 0xffffffff81100270 at trap_pfault+0x1e0 > #6 0xffffffff810d7c28 at calltrap+0x8 > #7 0xffffffff824bf80d at abd_iterate_func+0x12d > #8 0xffffffff8257ced6 at zio_checksum_generate+0x66 > #9 0xffffffff8257b26d at zio_execute+0xad > #10 0xffffffff80c412b4 at taskqueue_run_locked+0x144 > #11 0xffffffff80c426a2 at taskqueue_thread_loop+0xd2 > #12 0xffffffff80ba592e at fork_exit+0x7e > #13 0xffffffff810d8c5e at fork_trampoline+0xe > Uptime: 3d11h13m45s > > > Machine is stable/12 (very recent, built from clean sources), zpool upgraded to version 28. > > I’m now on a crossroad: Is it better to thoroughly test the memory, upgrade to stable/13, switch to out-of-tree OpenZFS or diagnose the ZFS further? > > Thanks! > otis > > — > Juraj Lutter > otis@FreeBSD.org > > > > > >