Re: Where might memory be reported?
- Reply: Andriy Gapon : "Re: Where might memory be reported?"
- In reply to: Dewayne Geraghty : "Re: Where might memory be reported?"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 07:39:55 UTC
On 2021-06-07 22:58, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: > This issue was raised in April '21 by Andriy Gapon title "stable/13, vm > page counts do not add up". > > This was mentioned > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253281 > though its probably more of an affirmation of a symptom. (reminder to > adjust status) > > More relevant is > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234559 > where Mark Johnson advised (in Feb '19) > "I've thought about this some more and decided to close this bug WONTFIX > for now. Basically, we started lazily dequeuing wired pages to avoid > the page queue synchronization cost incurred by frequent wirings. The > result is that wired pages may temporarily be counted as > active/inactive/laundry despite not being reclaimable. Maintaining the > previous behaviour wrt statistics would introduce synchronization > overhead that we've been trying to avoid in past and future work. I > don't plan to change the current behaviour and there doesn't seem to be > a compelling reason to do so, at least based on this report. If you or > anyone else would like to discuss this further or describe a use-case > that depends on the old behaviour, please feel free to re-open the bug." tl;dr I recognize this needs work. But it's a GREAT DEAL of work, and I currently have much shinier things on my to-do list. ;-) No offense to Mark. He's doing a tremendous job. I just couldn't resist. :-) --Chris > > I hope I've shed some light on the current situation, unfortunately not > in its resolution. > Regards, Dewayne.