From nobody Sat Jun 29 18:40:34 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-security@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WBLj120Hgz5PG82 for ; Sat, 29 Jun 2024 18:40:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R10" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WBLj04cgJz42f8; Sat, 29 Jun 2024 18:40:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1719686436; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=NAbuhAQKc8GTjt5F/Xhj40JO1rV+mH5BTEiynZu2z5k=; b=J7WH4nADGUNf++ShcK9NHZq1FjMpjXDLZDFSKDlqeCtUBCTKYgtHhZsbK2ohlkSGoEIKzq YRFi9+mF31GTsgaSdZJmMYR4GBfcBqAxj/iLlpgbfABH7TBU6bhc1pwGRCpjrIJkoVudaJ 2jmTbRl7j7KEkDTbUKzyaGh9gbPAUcv4YbnRAowPlRvb4aSSCDJ1vyG7eaI8FBFtT4gDOs 1yzF7aOVwDin86R4mVLgaxZt/1BXp6ufttse6I5yedDTZzkurX5Cx1cER/bHXTlaO369N0 dgZbt1HYgruqnryMJIHDZek0A7uDa2dKpxDk4IgaltfKIYFc/2cZs4iYK+Qcvw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1719686436; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=hk7mDwFLouU0IWfFLdhAg7ohGaviw6ICxbxFGZ+/vWfg3dMg6emGlnA5/+8Akw1y1zZhDb QYTFPGIqwMtuXhtzDg1pcTpEX3cWZVUOImfwa5Ad1yNmNmG4xcjluzHtG5eC34wwodAjNR Bod+u9SE28W6cZS2j2S6MHckYNU1zvKDf+Hpcd3Gj7trizv2YX0zQ4ZrTcBAGZOY3jPkNE 8T+rbY1m+kDCc+QTyqVBTJ/CElq9Uw3P2AYn+ECxlUt3ILF5uGBMIsb6Lg8ADx+OBUx9Gs GD1IFX5pspJm77Aib0ex32yEYtHuf4uTX+fdcmnksJK6FZyaazqRD8Xyivr25Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1719686436; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=NAbuhAQKc8GTjt5F/Xhj40JO1rV+mH5BTEiynZu2z5k=; b=PoVKaaknekAKfcT/H5U6H6hMenGW03XFAGbJToUDHStkVgQud+S0SQQydHuCkVnawlGBdF ltJzR1DjgrgpPBY+lE7QqYC9MMhCH4XJ8vLehHVU23jUezqaCUK2NBs5Bb/EFBVPpx5VlB 0Quts5JqU0o3mNcIFu9VZ0J/dvzwbbfwFE3fqZxsQUWgpQtLezhV7LaPTU/zj9pptHNyi5 PS7/75xvUzPJEjHCSvVFr4xNod4MU6u/Hb26wj7Awwwv4I+xgLmquy46A9vRCw1aFYacIY 3QbTeAd7NRK1PpK+ioOn5pBeok+ueCnLgYugJHgN58wfqvLpnAzCHbRrtu8UZw== Received: from ltc.des.dev (unknown [91.174.26.112]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: des) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4WBLj03VtdzTXj; Sat, 29 Jun 2024 18:40:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@freebsd.org) Received: by ltc.des.dev (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9ACE412369D; Sat, 29 Jun 2024 20:40:34 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: "Wall, Stephen" Cc: "freebsd-security@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: CVE 2024 1931 - unbound In-Reply-To: (Stephen Wall's message of "Wed, 26 Jun 2024 17:49:36 +0000") References: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 20:40:34 +0200 Message-ID: <86jzi71tjx.fsf@ltc.des.dev> List-Id: Security issues List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-security List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable "Wall, Stephen" writes: > This CVE lists unbound 1.19.1 as being vulnerable. This is the > version currently included in 14.0, but there is no Security Advisory > for it. Does this mean that the base system unbound can=E2=80=99t be use= d in > a way that makes it vulnerable, or is this something that needs to be > addressed? The base system unbound is meant to be used with a configuration generated by `local-unbound-setup`, which never enables the `ede` option which is a prerequisite for the DoS attack described in CVE-2024-1931. DES (speaking only for himself) --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@FreeBSD.org