From nobody Fri Jun 10 14:36:16 2022 X-Original-To: freebsd-security@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A61083B646 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 14:36:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pblok@bsd4all.org) Received: from mail.bsd4all.org (mail.bsd4all.org [88.99.169.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4LKNnN50K6z3jKc for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 14:36:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pblok@bsd4all.org) Received: from mail.bsd4all.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.bsd4all.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F037A581A; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 16:36:19 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bsd4all.org Received: from mail.bsd4all.org ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.bsd4all.org (mail.bsd4all.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ab4WQjF_ZUCa; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 16:36:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.34.65] (pony_ip [136.143.2.230]) by mail.bsd4all.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0DA5A5818; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 16:36:18 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-Id: Security issues List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-security List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\)) Subject: Re: Is apache24-2.4.54 vulnerable ? From: Peter Blok In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 16:36:16 +0200 Cc: Masachika ISHIZUKA , "freebsd-security@freebsd.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9CA37653-27D5-4A27-A5D2-9E47287B345E@bsd4all.org> References: <20220610.081507.1134393150579572029.ish@amail.plala.or.jp> <20220610.085155.1636577084047793852.moto@kawasaki3.org> <20220610.095448.1735421952196505841.ish@amail.plala.or.jp> To: "Wall, Stephen" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4LKNnN50K6z3jKc X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of pblok@bsd4all.org designates 88.99.169.216 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=pblok@bsd4all.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.10 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bsd4all.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.80)[0.797]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-security]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:88.99.0.0/16, country:DE]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N I think the question is this a typo in the vuln-2022.xml, because the = changelog shows the CVE are fixed in 2.4.54 > On 10 Jun 2022, at 15:20, Wall, Stephen = wrote: >=20 >> vuln-2022.xml: >> >> >> apache24 >> 2.5.54 <------- 2.4.54 ??? >> ~~~~~~ >> >> -- >> Masachika ISHIZUKA >=20 > `` indicates it affects versions less than 2.5.54. >=20 >=20 > -spw