From nobody Thu Jan 13 17:48:10 2022 X-Original-To: freebsd-security@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F36A61955964 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 17:48:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@lispworks.com) Received: from mail.lispworks.com (mail.lispworks.com [46.17.166.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4JZX3F00c9z51v8 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 17:48:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@lispworks.com) Received: from higson.cam.lispworks.com (higson.cam.lispworks.com [192.168.1.7]) by lwfs1-cam.cam.lispworks.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTP id 20DHmBSq020461; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 17:48:11 GMT (envelope-from martin@lispworks.com) Received: from higson.cam.lispworks.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by higson.cam.lispworks.com (8.14.4) id 20DHmBbP006307; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 17:48:11 GMT Received: (from martin@localhost) by higson.cam.lispworks.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id 20DHmAES006303; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 17:48:10 GMT Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 17:48:10 GMT Message-Id: <202201131748.20DHmAES006303@higson.cam.lispworks.com> From: Martin Simmons To: Axel Rau CC: FreeBSD-security@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: (message from Axel Rau on Wed, 12 Jan 2022 13:29:48 +0100) Subject: Re: Random failures: "unable to get local issuer certificate" References: <3a5cd966011999f62c7d66a263f12500@patpro.net> List-Id: Security issues List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-security List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4JZX3F00c9z51v8 X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of martin@lispworks.com has no SPF policy when checking 46.17.166.21) smtp.mailfrom=martin@lispworks.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.90 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.02)[-0.020]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[martin]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[46.17.166.21:from]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[lispworks.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.92)[0.917]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[FreeBSD-security]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:51055, ipnet:46.17.160.0/21, country:GB] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N >>>>> On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 13:29:48 +0100, Axel Rau said: > > > > Am 12.01.2022 um 12:05 schrieb patpro@patpro.net: > > > > may be (I have not tested) the result is different depending on DNS reply. > > > I don’t think so, as I have local resolvers which should have cached the AAAAs. Since sh.rustup.rs has multiple adddresses, the order in the DNS reply can change each time it is resolved (even from a cache), so might be using a different adddress each time. __Martin