WWN
- Reply: Scott Long : "Re: WWN"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 17:47:27 UTC
Is there a reason we don't rely primarily on WWN changing to detect a disk change at a particular location? I know it's not universally available, but anything made in the last 15 or 20 years should have one if my research is correct... Or is this just a case of inertia? I'm looking at making ahci a little more resilient to transient outages, and thought it might be best to key primarily off this and secondarily off other changed information when that's not available. If I had a WWN, then I'd know the disk that was gone for 500ms is the same one and I could resume its operations and still detect that someone unplugged drive A and plugged in drive B. Warner